H.C. Burrell

2.0k total citations
50 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

H.C. Burrell is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, H.C. Burrell has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 29 papers in Cancer Research and 18 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in H.C. Burrell's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (29 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (29 papers) and AI in cancer detection (12 papers). H.C. Burrell is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (29 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (29 papers) and AI in cancer detection (12 papers). H.C. Burrell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. H.C. Burrell's co-authors include A.R.M. Wilson, Sarah E. Pinder, Andrew Evans, Ian O. Ellis, Jonathan J. James, Andy Evans, Eleanor Cornford, R. Douglas Macmillan, D.M. Sibbering and L.J. Yeoman and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, British Journal of Cancer and Thorax.

In The Last Decade

H.C. Burrell

48 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
H.C. Burrell United Kingdom 22 589 554 547 455 384 50 1.4k
Jonathan J. James United Kingdom 23 532 0.9× 432 0.8× 700 1.3× 636 1.4× 522 1.4× 67 1.8k
C Campassi United States 7 415 0.7× 648 1.2× 365 0.7× 339 0.7× 542 1.4× 13 1.4k
William R. Poller United States 14 1.2k 2.0× 910 1.6× 801 1.5× 384 0.8× 472 1.2× 22 2.0k
Nisha Sharma United Kingdom 21 600 1.0× 565 1.0× 394 0.7× 196 0.4× 339 0.9× 134 1.4k
Mark J. Dryden United States 14 466 0.8× 384 0.7× 398 0.7× 234 0.5× 230 0.6× 24 1.1k
R. Schulz-Wendtland Germany 16 434 0.7× 350 0.6× 357 0.7× 381 0.8× 276 0.7× 65 1.2k
Pavel Crystal Canada 23 513 0.9× 695 1.3× 370 0.7× 287 0.6× 292 0.8× 45 1.6k
Jacopo Nori Italy 23 1.2k 2.1× 758 1.4× 628 1.1× 492 1.1× 334 0.9× 100 2.1k
A.R.M. Wilson United Kingdom 26 1.1k 1.9× 1.1k 1.9× 636 1.2× 283 0.6× 485 1.3× 65 2.0k
Paula B. Gordon Canada 15 317 0.5× 440 0.8× 358 0.7× 188 0.4× 216 0.6× 39 944

Countries citing papers authored by H.C. Burrell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.C. Burrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.C. Burrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.C. Burrell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.C. Burrell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.C. Burrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.C. Burrell. The network helps show where H.C. Burrell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H.C. Burrell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H.C. Burrell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H.C. Burrell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H.C. Burrell. H.C. Burrell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
James, Jonathan J., et al.. (2016). Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting. Clinical Radiology. 71(11). 1148–1155. 66 indexed citations
2.
Cornford, Eleanor, Anne Turnbull, Jonathan J. James, et al.. (2015). Accuracy of GE digital breast tomosynthesisvssupplementary mammographic views for diagnosis of screen-detected soft-tissue breast lesions. British Journal of Radiology. 89(1058). 20150735–20150735. 9 indexed citations
3.
4.
Rakha, Emad A., Andrew H.S. Lee, Maysa E. El‐Sayed, et al.. (2010). Screen-detected malignant breast lesions diagnosed following benign (B2) or normal (B1) needle core biopsy diagnoses. European Journal of Cancer. 46(10). 1835–1840. 4 indexed citations
5.
Agrawal, Amit, H.C. Burrell, Eleanor Cornford, et al.. (2007). Can computerised tomography replace bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastases from breast cancer? A prospective study. The Breast. 17(1). 98–103. 24 indexed citations
6.
Cornford, Eleanor, et al.. (2005). The pathological and radiological features of screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed following arbitration of discordant double reading opinions. Clinical Radiology. 60(11). 1182–1187. 22 indexed citations
7.
Evans, Andy, Jonathan J. James, Stephen Chan, et al.. (2004). Brain metastases from breast cancer: identification of a high-risk group. Clinical Oncology. 16(5). 345–349. 128 indexed citations
8.
Evans, Andy, Sarah E. Pinder, Jonathan J. James, et al.. (2004). Patterns of metastatic breast carcinoma: influence of tumour histological grade. Clinical Radiology. 59(12). 1094–1098. 38 indexed citations
9.
Rampaul, R.S., N J Dudley, H.C. Burrell, et al.. (2003). Radioisotope for occult lesion localisation (ROLL) of the breast does not require extra radiation protection procedures. The Breast. 12(2). 150–152. 19 indexed citations
10.
Evans, Andy, Eleanor Cornford, A.R.M. Wilson, et al.. (2003). Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary operable breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 89(7). 1310–1313. 123 indexed citations
11.
Burrell, H.C., Andrew Evans, A.R.M. Wilson, & Sarah E. Pinder. (2001). False-negative Breast Screening Assessment. What Lessons Can We Learn?. Clinical Radiology. 56(5). 385–388. 52 indexed citations
12.
Pinder, Sarah E., et al.. (2001). Growth pattern of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a retrospective analysis based on mammographic findings. British Journal of Cancer. 85(2). 225–227. 34 indexed citations
13.
Evans, Andrew, H.C. Burrell, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (2000). Digital Imaging Improves Upright Stereotactic Core Biopsy of Mammographic Microcalcifications. Clinical Radiology. 55(5). 374–377. 14 indexed citations
14.
Teh, William, A.R.M. Wilson, Andrew Evans, et al.. (2000). Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy of Suspicious Mammographic Calcifications Using High Frequency and Power Doppler Ultrasound. Clinical Radiology. 55(5). 390–394. 31 indexed citations
15.
Evans, Andrew, H.C. Burrell, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (1999). A comparison of 14 and 12 gauge needles for core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcification.. British Journal of Radiology. 72(864). 1152–1154. 5 indexed citations
16.
Evans, Andy, A.R.M. Wilson, H.C. Burrell, Ian O. Ellis, & Sarah E. Pinder. (1999). Mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) present on previous mammography. Clinical Radiology. 54(10). 644–646. 38 indexed citations
17.
Burrell, H.C. & Norman McConachie. (1998). Pachymeningitis in Wegener's granulomatosis. Australasian Radiology. 42(4). 364–366. 9 indexed citations
18.
Burrell, H.C., D.M. Sibbering, A.R.M. Wilson, et al.. (1996). Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.. Radiology. 199(3). 811–817. 159 indexed citations
19.
Burrell, H.C., D.M. Sibbering, S Pinder, et al.. (1995). 98. Mammographic features of interval cancers and prognosis compared with screen detected and symptomatic breast cancers. The Breast. 4(3). 255–255. 2 indexed citations
20.
Burrell, H.C., et al.. (1994). Significant plain film findings in sigmoid volvulus. Clinical Radiology. 49(5). 317–319. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026