Janet Litherland

876 total citations
23 papers, 442 citations indexed

About

Janet Litherland is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Litherland has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 442 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Cancer Research, 11 papers in Oncology and 9 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Janet Litherland's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (13 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers). Janet Litherland is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (13 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers). Janet Litherland collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Janet Litherland's co-authors include C. Cordiner, Sheila Stallard, D. Hole, A.R.M. Wilson, Andy Evans, David T. Sharpe, Sarah E. Pinder, Ian O. Ellis, James Kollias and Amanda Wilson and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, British journal of surgery and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Janet Litherland

23 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet Litherland United Kingdom 14 206 159 158 138 69 23 442
David J. Gillett Australia 12 189 0.9× 159 1.0× 149 0.9× 140 1.0× 63 0.9× 33 401
Manon J. Pepels Netherlands 11 230 1.1× 128 0.8× 156 1.0× 152 1.1× 57 0.8× 35 400
Kyungran Ko South Korea 11 95 0.5× 92 0.6× 76 0.5× 127 0.9× 279 4.0× 15 486
Eric Peltz United States 9 701 3.4× 408 2.6× 611 3.9× 220 1.6× 65 0.9× 9 862
Alison Laws United States 13 301 1.5× 146 0.9× 191 1.2× 162 1.2× 40 0.6× 41 412
Fuat Celebioglu Sweden 14 332 1.6× 288 1.8× 229 1.4× 164 1.2× 77 1.1× 24 534
Dvora Cyrlak United States 9 94 0.5× 122 0.8× 165 1.0× 116 0.8× 68 1.0× 13 344
Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov Denmark 16 460 2.2× 283 1.8× 351 2.2× 196 1.4× 49 0.7× 63 650
P.G.M. Peer Netherlands 8 199 1.0× 58 0.4× 84 0.5× 257 1.9× 141 2.0× 9 435
Nathalie Duchesne Canada 7 156 0.8× 48 0.3× 180 1.1× 85 0.6× 22 0.3× 13 303

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Litherland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Litherland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Litherland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Litherland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Litherland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Litherland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Litherland. The network helps show where Janet Litherland may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Litherland

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Litherland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Litherland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Litherland. Janet Litherland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Maxwell, Anthony, Bridget Hilton, Karen Clements, et al.. (2022). Unresected screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: Outcomes of 311 women in the Forget-Me-Not 2 study. The Breast. 61. 145–155. 21 indexed citations
2.
Clements, Karen, David Dodwell, Bridget Hilton, et al.. (2022). Cohort profile of the Sloane Project: methodology for a prospective UK cohort study of >15 000 women with screen-detected non-invasive breast neoplasia. BMJ Open. 12(12). e061585–e061585. 3 indexed citations
3.
Shaaban, Abeer M., Bridget Hilton, Karen Clements, et al.. (2022). The presentation, management and outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with microinvasion (invasion ≤1 mm in size)—results from the UK Sloane Project. British Journal of Cancer. 127(12). 2125–2132. 14 indexed citations
4.
Lannigan, Alison, Julie Doughty, Janet Litherland, et al.. (2018). Population-based study of the sensitivity of axillary ultrasound imaging in the preoperative staging of node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. British journal of surgery. 105(8). 987–995. 22 indexed citations
7.
Litherland, Janet, et al.. (2011). The use of imaging in patients post breast reconstruction. Clinical Radiology. 67(2). 128–133. 10 indexed citations
8.
Litherland, Janet, et al.. (2008). Imaging breast augmentation and reconstruction. British Journal of Radiology. 81(967). 587–595. 23 indexed citations
9.
Litherland, Janet, et al.. (2007). Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Explantation Investigation of Long-Term Silicone Gel Implant Integrity. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 120(5). 1401–1406. 33 indexed citations
10.
Cordiner, C., et al.. (2006). Does the insertion of more than one wire allow successful excision of large clusters of malignant calcification?. Clinical Radiology. 61(8). 686–690. 13 indexed citations
11.
Litherland, Janet. (2004). Screening for breast cancer. The Journal of the British Menopause Society. 10(1). 24–29. 6 indexed citations
12.
Weiler-Mithoff, Eva, Suzanne Hagen, Karlien Van de Sijpe, et al.. (2003). Do pre-operative abdominal exercises prevent post-operative donor site complications for women undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction? A two-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 56(7). 674–683. 46 indexed citations
13.
Litherland, Janet. (2001). The role of needle biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. The Breast. 10(5). 383–387. 15 indexed citations
14.
Litherland, Janet & H. Dobson. (2001). Symptomatic women with normal screening mammograms: is assessment by the breast screening programme justifiable?. The Breast. 10(1). 58–60. 1 indexed citations
15.
Litherland, Janet. (2000). The effects of HRT on screening mammography. The Breast. 9(3). 117–124. 6 indexed citations
16.
Litherland, Janet, Sheila Stallard, D. Hole, & C. Cordiner. (1999). The effect of hormone replacement therapy on the sensitivity of screening mammograms. Clinical Radiology. 54(5). 285–288. 60 indexed citations
17.
Litherland, Janet, Andy Evans, & A.R.M. Wilson. (1997). The effect of hormone replacement therapy on recall rate in the national health service breast screening programme. Clinical Radiology. 52(4). 276–279. 39 indexed citations
18.
Litherland, Janet, Andrew Evans, Amanda Wilson, et al.. (1996). The impact of core-biopsy on pre-operative diagnosis rate of screen detected breast cancers. Clinical Radiology. 51(8). 562–565. 50 indexed citations
19.
Litherland, Janet & Ray Ashleigh. (1996). Case report: Transvenous embolization of a traumatic arteriovenous fistula. Clinical Radiology. 51(12). 886–889. 8 indexed citations
20.
Litherland, Janet, et al.. (1993). Antenatal ultrasound diagnosis of cerebellar vermian agenesis in a case of rhombencephalosynapsis. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 21(9). 636–638. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026