D.M. Sibbering

1.0k total citations
35 papers, 706 citations indexed

About

D.M. Sibbering is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, D.M. Sibbering has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 706 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Cancer Research, 17 papers in Oncology and 11 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in D.M. Sibbering's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (18 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (13 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (11 papers). D.M. Sibbering is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (18 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (13 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (11 papers). D.M. Sibbering collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Hungary. D.M. Sibbering's co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, A.R.M. Wilson, S Pinder, J.F.R. Robertson, Andrew Evans, H.C. Burrell, C.W. Elston, R.W. Blamey, L.J. Yeoman and C.W. Elston and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Research, Radiology and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

D.M. Sibbering

31 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D.M. Sibbering United Kingdom 15 363 326 237 132 115 35 706
Jennifer Chun United States 14 311 0.9× 286 0.9× 220 0.9× 138 1.0× 69 0.6× 46 719
R Bonardi Italy 18 384 1.1× 378 1.2× 336 1.4× 93 0.7× 39 0.3× 36 845
H. Lavina A. Lickley Canada 15 282 0.8× 479 1.5× 327 1.4× 74 0.6× 54 0.5× 27 668
Cassann Blake United States 5 298 0.8× 368 1.1× 447 1.9× 52 0.4× 133 1.2× 11 757
U Dyreborg Denmark 12 270 0.7× 263 0.8× 272 1.1× 36 0.3× 69 0.6× 31 621
MJ Michell United Kingdom 13 207 0.6× 247 0.8× 322 1.4× 150 1.1× 26 0.2× 39 658
Nirmala Pathmanathan Australia 14 245 0.7× 273 0.8× 152 0.6× 47 0.4× 39 0.3× 40 553
Corrado Tinterri Italy 18 487 1.3× 621 1.9× 318 1.3× 50 0.4× 113 1.0× 79 1.1k
Kathryn A Carolin United States 10 297 0.8× 308 0.9× 219 0.9× 23 0.2× 66 0.6× 11 586
Pamela H. Craig United States 8 370 1.0× 790 2.4× 684 2.9× 62 0.5× 63 0.5× 10 965

Countries citing papers authored by D.M. Sibbering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.M. Sibbering's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.M. Sibbering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.M. Sibbering more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.M. Sibbering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.M. Sibbering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.M. Sibbering. The network helps show where D.M. Sibbering may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.M. Sibbering

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.M. Sibbering. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.M. Sibbering based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.M. Sibbering. D.M. Sibbering is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Robertson, J.F.R., et al.. (2025). East Midlands Breast Pain Pathway: An Evaluation of Community Breast Pain Clinics Across the East Midlands Cancer Alliance. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 31(4). e70150–e70150.
3.
Ellis, Ian O., Fleur Webster, Kimberly H. Allison, et al.. (2024). Dataset for reporting of the invasive carcinoma of the breast: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Histopathology. 85(3). 418–436. 3 indexed citations
4.
Evans, D. Gareth, Sue Thomas, Adam R. Brentnall, et al.. (2019). Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35–39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer. EClinicalMedicine. 7. 39–46. 7 indexed citations
5.
Jenkins, Jacquie, et al.. (2014). Film reading in the East Midlands Breast Screening Programme – Are we missing opportunities for earlier diagnosis?. Clinical Radiology. 69(4). 385–390. 5 indexed citations
6.
Evans, D. Gareth, Sue Thomas, Anthony Howell, et al.. (2013). Mammographic surveillance in women aged 35–39 at enhanced familial risk of breast cancer (FH02). Familial Cancer. 13(1). 13–21. 11 indexed citations
7.
Agrawal, Amit, Mandeep S. Grewal, D.M. Sibbering, & Carol-Ann Courtney. (2013). Surgical and Oncological Outcome After Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Clinical Breast Cancer. 13(6). 478–481. 16 indexed citations
8.
Caldon, L J M, Karen Collins, Sam H. Ahmedzai, et al.. (2011). Why do hospital mastectomy rates vary? Differences in the decision-making experiences of women with breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 104(10). 1551–1557. 36 indexed citations
9.
Robertson, J.F.R., J. Michael Dixon, D.M. Sibbering, et al.. (2009). Tumor Biomarker Changes Following Pre-Surgical Treatment with 500 mg Fulvestrant Plus Anastrozole Versus 500 mg Fulvestrant Alone and 1 mg Anastrozole Alone.. Cancer Research. 69(24_Supplement). 24–24. 13 indexed citations
10.
Burrell, H.C., D.M. Sibbering, A.R.M. Wilson, et al.. (1996). Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.. Radiology. 199(3). 811–817. 159 indexed citations
11.
Kollias, James, D.M. Sibbering, Amanda Wilson, et al.. (1996). PP-4-35 Breast screening for women aged — results from a family history clinic. European Journal of Cancer. 32. 33–33. 1 indexed citations
12.
Burrell, H.C., et al.. (1996). Do mammographic features of locally recurrent breast cancer mimic those of the original tumour?. The Breast. 5(4). 233–236. 3 indexed citations
14.
Burrell, H.C., D.M. Sibbering, S Pinder, et al.. (1995). 98. Mammographic features of interval cancers and prognosis compared with screen detected and symptomatic breast cancers. The Breast. 4(3). 255–255. 2 indexed citations
15.
Sibbering, D.M., M.H. Galea, D.A.L. Morgan, et al.. (1995). Safe selection criteria for breast conservation without radical excision in primary operable invasive breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer. 31(13-14). 2191–2195. 18 indexed citations
16.
Burrell, H.C., D.M. Sibbering, & A.R.M. Wilson. (1995). Fibromatosis of the breast in a male patient. British Journal of Radiology. 68(814). 1128–1129. 22 indexed citations
17.
Evans, Andy, Sarah E. Pinder, Ian O. Ellis, et al.. (1994). Correlations between the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma In situ (DCIS) and C-erbB-2 oncogene expression. Clinical Radiology. 49(8). 559–562. 29 indexed citations
18.
Spencer, Nick J., Andrew Evans, M.H. Galea, et al.. (1994). Pathological-radiological correlations in benign lesions excised during a breast screening programme. Clinical Radiology. 49(12). 853–856. 22 indexed citations
19.
Evans, Andrew, Sarah E. Pinder, Ian O. Ellis, et al.. (1994). The radiological appearances of invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast. Clinical Radiology. 49(10). 693–695. 18 indexed citations
20.
Sibbering, D.M., A P Locker, J D Hardcastle, & N C Armitage. (1994). Blood transfusion and survival in colorectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 37(4). 358–363. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026