A.R.M. Wilson

2.9k total citations
65 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

A.R.M. Wilson is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, A.R.M. Wilson has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Cancer Research, 35 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 31 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in A.R.M. Wilson's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (37 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (35 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (23 papers). A.R.M. Wilson is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (37 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (35 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (23 papers). A.R.M. Wilson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. A.R.M. Wilson's co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, Sarah E. Pinder, H.C. Burrell, Andy Evans, Andrew Evans, R. Cochrane, R.D. Macmillan, SK Al‐Ghazal, William Teh and L.J. Yeoman and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, British Journal of Cancer and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

A.R.M. Wilson

64 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A.R.M. Wilson United Kingdom 26 1.1k 1.1k 636 485 457 65 2.0k
William R. Poller United States 14 1.2k 1.1× 910 0.8× 801 1.3× 472 1.0× 348 0.8× 22 2.0k
Jacopo Nori Italy 23 1.2k 1.1× 758 0.7× 628 1.0× 334 0.7× 491 1.1× 100 2.1k
M Mravunac Netherlands 20 1.6k 1.4× 1.3k 1.2× 951 1.5× 219 0.5× 630 1.4× 44 2.7k
G Cardenosa United States 16 585 0.5× 817 0.8× 665 1.0× 307 0.6× 696 1.5× 39 1.8k
Enrico Cassano Italy 31 820 0.7× 727 0.7× 499 0.8× 446 0.9× 241 0.5× 149 2.5k
H.C. Burrell United Kingdom 22 589 0.5× 554 0.5× 547 0.9× 384 0.8× 228 0.5× 50 1.4k
Pavel Crystal Canada 23 513 0.5× 695 0.6× 370 0.6× 292 0.6× 183 0.4× 45 1.6k
Eun Young Ko South Korea 34 699 0.6× 794 0.7× 527 0.8× 517 1.1× 920 2.0× 144 3.3k
H. Madjar Germany 21 541 0.5× 595 0.6× 300 0.5× 284 0.6× 162 0.4× 76 1.6k
Byung Joo Song South Korea 27 593 0.5× 550 0.5× 449 0.7× 132 0.3× 484 1.1× 112 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by A.R.M. Wilson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.R.M. Wilson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.R.M. Wilson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.R.M. Wilson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.R.M. Wilson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.R.M. Wilson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.R.M. Wilson. The network helps show where A.R.M. Wilson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.R.M. Wilson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.R.M. Wilson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.R.M. Wilson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.R.M. Wilson. A.R.M. Wilson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Flynn, Elizabeth, A.R.M. Wilson, & MJ Michell. (2010). Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art. Clinical Radiology. 65(4). 259–270. 108 indexed citations
2.
Cornford, Eleanor, et al.. (2005). The pathological and radiological features of screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed following arbitration of discordant double reading opinions. Clinical Radiology. 60(11). 1182–1187. 22 indexed citations
3.
Rampaul, R.S., N J Dudley, H.C. Burrell, et al.. (2003). Radioisotope for occult lesion localisation (ROLL) of the breast does not require extra radiation protection procedures. The Breast. 12(2). 150–152. 19 indexed citations
4.
Burrell, H.C., Andrew Evans, A.R.M. Wilson, & Sarah E. Pinder. (2001). False-negative Breast Screening Assessment. What Lessons Can We Learn?. Clinical Radiology. 56(5). 385–388. 52 indexed citations
5.
Pinder, Sarah E., et al.. (2001). Growth pattern of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a retrospective analysis based on mammographic findings. British Journal of Cancer. 85(2). 225–227. 34 indexed citations
6.
Evans, Andrew, H.C. Burrell, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (2000). Digital Imaging Improves Upright Stereotactic Core Biopsy of Mammographic Microcalcifications. Clinical Radiology. 55(5). 374–377. 14 indexed citations
7.
Hackshaw, Allan, Nicholas Wald, MJ Michell, S. Field, & A.R.M. Wilson. (2000). An Investigation Into Why Two-View Mammography is Better than One-View in Breast Cancer Screening. Clinical Radiology. 55(6). 454–458. 28 indexed citations
8.
Teh, William, A.R.M. Wilson, Andrew Evans, et al.. (2000). Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy of Suspicious Mammographic Calcifications Using High Frequency and Power Doppler Ultrasound. Clinical Radiology. 55(5). 390–394. 31 indexed citations
9.
Evans, Andrew, H.C. Burrell, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (1999). A comparison of 14 and 12 gauge needles for core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcification.. British Journal of Radiology. 72(864). 1152–1154. 5 indexed citations
10.
Hall, Nigel, Andrew Evans, James Kollias, et al.. (1999). Bilateral breast carcinomas: Do they have similar mammographic features?. Clinical Radiology. 54(7). 434–437. 3 indexed citations
11.
Evans, Andy, A.R.M. Wilson, H.C. Burrell, Ian O. Ellis, & Sarah E. Pinder. (1999). Mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) present on previous mammography. Clinical Radiology. 54(10). 644–646. 38 indexed citations
12.
Pinder, Sarah E., et al.. (1997). The detection of ductal carcinoma in situ at mammographic screening enables the diagnosis of small, grade 3 invasive tumours. British Journal of Cancer. 75(4). 542–544. 26 indexed citations
13.
Chopra, Sameer, Andy Evans, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (1996). Pure mucinous breast cancer-mammographic and ultrasound findings. Clinical Radiology. 51(6). 421–424. 30 indexed citations
14.
Burrell, H.C., D.M. Sibbering, A.R.M. Wilson, et al.. (1996). Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.. Radiology. 199(3). 811–817. 159 indexed citations
15.
Evans, Andy, et al.. (1996). Is ipsilateral mammography worthwhile in paget's disease of the breast?. Clinical Radiology. 51(1). 35–38. 45 indexed citations
16.
Young, Jason R. & A.R.M. Wilson. (1995). The use of imaging in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer. Clinical Oncology. 7(4). 239–240. 4 indexed citations
17.
Evans, Andy, Sarah E. Pinder, Ian O. Ellis, et al.. (1994). Correlations between the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma In situ (DCIS) and C-erbB-2 oncogene expression. Clinical Radiology. 49(8). 559–562. 29 indexed citations
18.
Yeoman, L.J., A.R.M. Wilson, & Andy Evans. (1994). Screening for breast cancer. BMJ. 308(6931). 792.2–792.2.
19.
Spencer, Nick J., Andrew Evans, M.H. Galea, et al.. (1994). Pathological-radiological correlations in benign lesions excised during a breast screening programme. Clinical Radiology. 49(12). 853–856. 22 indexed citations
20.
Evans, Andrew, Sarah E. Pinder, Ian O. Ellis, et al.. (1994). The radiological appearances of invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast. Clinical Radiology. 49(10). 693–695. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by William R. Poller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jacopo Nori Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M Mravunac Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G Cardenosa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Enrico Cassano Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H.C. Burrell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pavel Crystal Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eun Young Ko Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. Madjar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Byung Joo Song
Rankless by CCL
2026