S Pinder

2.2k total citations
62 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

S Pinder is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, S Pinder has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Cancer Research, 24 papers in Oncology and 23 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in S Pinder's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (28 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (23 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (12 papers). S Pinder is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (28 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (23 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (12 papers). S Pinder collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. S Pinder's co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, C.W. Elston, J.F.R. Robertson, Emad A. Rakha, D.M. Sibbering, A.R.M. Wilson, C.W. Elston, R.W. Blamey, R.W. Blamey and Sarah Lewis and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

S Pinder

60 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

S Pinder
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cancer Research 725
  • Oncology 670
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 552
  • Molecular Biology 386
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 261
Replace Sadako Akashi‐Tanaka with:
Sadako Akashi‐Tanaka Japan
Clive Wells United Kingdom
Sophia K. Apple United States
F P O’Malley Canada
Vania Vezzosi Italy
Helen Denley United Kingdom
Anna W. Poniecka United States
Timothy M. D’Alfonso United States
Erika Resetkova United States
Zsolt Hodi United Kingdom
Sadako Akashi‐Tanaka Japan View profile →
Citations per field, relative to S Pinder
S Pinder · 1×
Citations per year, relative to S Pinder
S Pinder · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by S Pinder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S Pinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S Pinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S Pinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S Pinder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S Pinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S Pinder. The network helps show where S Pinder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S Pinder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S Pinder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S Pinder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S Pinder. S Pinder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 4
3
MYC amplification in breast cancer: A chromogenic in situ hybridisation study
1
4
Total Loss of MHC Class I is an Independent Indicator of Good Prognosis in Breast Cancer
5
5 29
6 86
7
Prognostic factors for patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer
4
8 72
9 48
10 33
11
C-erbB2 expression predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.
25
12 28
13 106
14 28
15 159
16 45
17 138
18 2
19 42
20 40

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026