M Galea
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 9
-
- Cancer and Skin Lesions 4
- Co-authors
- Ian O. EllisR.W. BlameyC.W. ElstonA P LockerSarah E. PinderHolly HollidayJA BellL. Kapila
- Journals
- British Journal of Cancer (3 papers)Histopathology (3 papers)British journal of surgery (3 papers)The Breast (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
M Galea
18 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Cancer Research 800
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 599
- Oncology 619
- Dermatology 128
- Nutrition and Dietetics 136
Countries citing papers authored by M Galea
This map shows the geographic impact of M Galea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Galea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Galea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M Galea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Galea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Galea. The network helps show where M Galea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M Galea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 138 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 80 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 57 | |
| 8 | Ideas in pathology. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a proposal for a new simplified histological classification association between cellular proliferation and c-erbB-2 protein expression. | 1994 | 102 |
| 9 | 1994 | 224 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 59 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 82 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 362 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 88 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 22 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 32 |
About M Galea
M Galea is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Dermatology, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Urology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (4 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (3 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (800 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (599 citations), Oncology (619 citations), Dermatology (128 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (136 citations). M Galea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, R.W. Blamey, C.W. Elston, A P Locker, C.W. Elston, Sarah E. Pinder, R.W. Blamey, Holly Holliday, JA Bell and L. Kapila. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Histopathology, British journal of surgery, The Breast and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.