L.J. Yeoman

859 total citations
24 papers, 646 citations indexed

About

L.J. Yeoman is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, L.J. Yeoman has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 646 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Cancer Research, 9 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 9 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in L.J. Yeoman's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (11 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers). L.J. Yeoman is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (11 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers). L.J. Yeoman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. L.J. Yeoman's co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, A.R.M. Wilson, Andrew Evans, C.W. Elston, Sarah E. Pinder, H.C. Burrell, D.M. Sibbering, S Pinder, Andy Evans and R.W. Blamey and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, British journal of surgery and British Journal of Radiology.

In The Last Decade

L.J. Yeoman

23 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
L.J. Yeoman United Kingdom 14 278 234 186 183 181 24 646
MJ Michell United Kingdom 13 322 1.2× 247 1.1× 207 1.1× 155 0.8× 150 0.8× 39 658
Ellen Shaw de Paredes United States 15 334 1.2× 232 1.0× 218 1.2× 189 1.0× 202 1.1× 30 719
Michael Koretz Israel 13 293 1.1× 246 1.1× 355 1.9× 162 0.9× 178 1.0× 30 804
Hiroko Tsunoda Japan 15 336 1.2× 316 1.4× 204 1.1× 327 1.8× 147 0.8× 100 808
Paula B. Gordon Canada 15 440 1.6× 317 1.4× 358 1.9× 254 1.4× 216 1.2× 39 944
Volker Duda Germany 11 260 0.9× 170 0.7× 107 0.6× 185 1.0× 141 0.8× 41 525
Deborah O. Jeffries United States 11 209 0.8× 156 0.7× 123 0.7× 165 0.9× 132 0.7× 17 437
G C Hansen United States 11 238 0.9× 143 0.6× 69 0.4× 152 0.8× 125 0.7× 17 683
Ermelinda Bonaccio United States 9 285 1.0× 202 0.9× 96 0.5× 234 1.3× 196 1.1× 15 600
Yung‐Feng Lo Taiwan 15 288 1.0× 317 1.4× 201 1.1× 361 2.0× 145 0.8× 46 819

Countries citing papers authored by L.J. Yeoman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.J. Yeoman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.J. Yeoman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.J. Yeoman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.J. Yeoman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.J. Yeoman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.J. Yeoman. The network helps show where L.J. Yeoman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L.J. Yeoman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L.J. Yeoman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L.J. Yeoman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L.J. Yeoman. L.J. Yeoman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Evans, Andrew, Sarah E. Pinder, A.R.M. Wilson, et al.. (1997). Correlations between the mammographic features of screen detected invasive breast cancer and pathological prognostic factors. The Breast. 6(3). 146–149. 21 indexed citations
2.
Yeoman, L.J., H.C. Burrell, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (1997). Mammographic and pathological features of breast cancer detected at first incident round screening. The Breast. 6(5). 259–265. 6 indexed citations
3.
Litherland, Janet, Andrew Evans, Amanda Wilson, et al.. (1996). The impact of core-biopsy on pre-operative diagnosis rate of screen detected breast cancers. Clinical Radiology. 51(8). 562–565. 50 indexed citations
4.
Chopra, Sameer, Andy Evans, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (1996). Pure mucinous breast cancer-mammographic and ultrasound findings. Clinical Radiology. 51(6). 421–424. 30 indexed citations
5.
Burrell, H.C., D.M. Sibbering, A.R.M. Wilson, et al.. (1996). Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.. Radiology. 199(3). 811–817. 159 indexed citations
6.
Evans, Andy, et al.. (1996). Is ipsilateral mammography worthwhile in paget's disease of the breast?. Clinical Radiology. 51(1). 35–38. 45 indexed citations
7.
Burrell, H.C., Sarah E. Pinder, A.R.M. Wilson, et al.. (1996). The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: A review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions. Clinical Radiology. 51(4). 277–281. 58 indexed citations
8.
Burrell, H.C., D.M. Sibbering, S Pinder, et al.. (1995). 98. Mammographic features of interval cancers and prognosis compared with screen detected and symptomatic breast cancers. The Breast. 4(3). 255–255. 2 indexed citations
9.
Evans, Andy, Sarah E. Pinder, Ian O. Ellis, et al.. (1994). Correlations between the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma In situ (DCIS) and C-erbB-2 oncogene expression. Clinical Radiology. 49(8). 559–562. 29 indexed citations
10.
Yeoman, L.J., A.R.M. Wilson, & Andy Evans. (1994). Screening for breast cancer. BMJ. 308(6931). 792.2–792.2.
11.
Spencer, Nick J., Andrew Evans, M.H. Galea, et al.. (1994). Pathological-radiological correlations in benign lesions excised during a breast screening programme. Clinical Radiology. 49(12). 853–856. 22 indexed citations
12.
Evans, Andrew, Sarah E. Pinder, Ian O. Ellis, et al.. (1994). The radiological appearances of invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast. Clinical Radiology. 49(10). 693–695. 18 indexed citations
13.
Yeoman, L.J., Ameet G. Patel, & MJ Michell. (1994). Case report: Computed tomography appearances in a right paraduodenal hernia. Clinical Radiology. 49(12). 898–900. 13 indexed citations
14.
Parker, Jon, David R. Dance, D. Huw Davies, et al.. (1993). <title>Classification of ductal carcinoma in-situ by image analysis of calcifications from mammograms</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1905. 832–840. 3 indexed citations
15.
Yeoman, L.J., S Humphreys, H.B. Nunnerley, & MJ Michell. (1993). Comparison of radiographically-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core biopsy (CB) in the assessment of impalpable breast lesions. Clinical Radiology. 48(5). 349–350. 1 indexed citations
16.
Yeoman, L.J., et al.. (1992). Gantry angulation in brain CT: dosage implications, effect on posterior fossa artifacts, and current international practice.. Radiology. 184(1). 113–116. 62 indexed citations
17.
Yeoman, L.J., et al.. (1991). Ultrasonic patterns in inflammatory bowel disease. Clinical Radiology. 43(3). 171–175. 42 indexed citations
18.
Yeoman, L.J., Malcolm D. Mason, & J F Olliff. (1991). Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the bladder — CT and MRI appearances. Clinical Radiology. 44(6). 389–392. 17 indexed citations
19.
Yeoman, L.J., Harry R. Dalton, & E.J. Adam. (1990). Fat-Fluid Level in Pleural Effusion as a Complication of a Mediastinal Dermoid. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 14(2). 307–309. 7 indexed citations
20.
Yeoman, L.J. & D. Shaw. (1989). Computerized tomography appearances of pelvic haemangioma involving the large bowel in childhood. Pediatric Radiology. 19(6-7). 414–416. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026