Craig Timm
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Family Practice top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Summers KalishmanSharon WayneEllen CosgroveLatha ChandranMaryellen E. GusicSuzanne RoseConstance D. BaldwinDeborah Simpson
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers)Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers)Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Family PracticePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthEmergency Medical Services
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Journal of Preventive MedicineAcademic Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Craig Timm
14 papers receiving 334 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 220
- General Health Professions 124
- Family Practice 61
- Education 61
- Psychiatry and Mental health 57
Countries citing papers authored by Craig Timm
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Timm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Timm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Timm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Timm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Timm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Timm. The network helps show where Craig Timm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Timm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Timm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Timm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Timm. Craig Timm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 80 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 83 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 6 |
About Craig Timm
Craig Timm is a scholar working on Family Practice, Gender Studies and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 14 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (61 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (220 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (51 citations). Craig Timm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Summers Kalishman, Sharon Wayne, Ellen Cosgrove, Latha Chandran, Maryellen E. Gusic, Suzanne Rose, Constance D. Baldwin, Deborah Simpson, Henry W. Strobel and R M Fincher. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Academic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.