Claudia Stöcker

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 830 citations indexed

About

Claudia Stöcker is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change and Geology. According to data from OpenAlex, Claudia Stöcker has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 830 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Environmental Engineering, 7 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 7 papers in Geology. Recurrent topics in Claudia Stöcker's work include Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (15 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (7 papers) and 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications (6 papers). Claudia Stöcker is often cited by papers focused on Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (15 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (7 papers) and 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications (6 papers). Claudia Stöcker collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Australia. Claudia Stöcker's co-authors include Francesco Nex, M. Gerke, J.A. Zevenbergen, Rohan Bennett, Anette Eltner, Pierre Karrasch, Mila Koeva, Joep Crompvoets, Sophie Crommelinck and Serene Ho and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Remote Sensing and Land Use Policy.

In The Last Decade

Claudia Stöcker

18 papers receiving 802 citations

Hit Papers

Review of the Current State of UAV Regulations 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Claudia Stöcker Netherlands 11 347 284 233 128 122 18 830
Matti Kurkela Finland 14 339 1.0× 131 0.5× 289 1.2× 71 0.6× 117 1.0× 42 621
Bharat Lohani India 16 451 1.3× 132 0.5× 307 1.3× 59 0.5× 50 0.4× 67 798
Mila Koeva Netherlands 20 554 1.6× 126 0.4× 375 1.6× 119 0.9× 220 1.8× 95 1.3k
Enoc Sanz‐Ablanedo Spain 15 463 1.3× 151 0.5× 356 1.5× 25 0.2× 97 0.8× 32 865
Juho‐Pekka Virtanen Finland 19 693 2.0× 208 0.7× 523 2.2× 44 0.3× 172 1.4× 59 1.2k
Ken Whitehead Canada 10 552 1.6× 189 0.7× 382 1.6× 60 0.5× 126 1.0× 14 977
Caroline Gevaert Netherlands 18 475 1.4× 111 0.4× 199 0.9× 36 0.3× 320 2.6× 46 1.4k
Peter Blišťan Slovakia 17 292 0.8× 106 0.4× 230 1.0× 28 0.2× 200 1.6× 63 816
Alias Abdul Rahman Malaysia 16 313 0.9× 73 0.3× 273 1.2× 36 0.3× 131 1.1× 133 1.2k
Murat Yakar Türkiye 22 582 1.7× 189 0.7× 807 3.5× 25 0.2× 152 1.2× 113 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Stöcker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Stöcker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Stöcker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Stöcker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Stöcker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Stöcker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Stöcker. The network helps show where Claudia Stöcker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia Stöcker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia Stöcker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia Stöcker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia Stöcker. Claudia Stöcker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Stöcker, Claudia, Rohan Bennett, Mila Koeva, Francesco Nex, & J.A. Zevenbergen. (2022). Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity. Land Use Policy. 114. 105930–105930. 15 indexed citations
2.
Koeva, Mila, et al.. (2021). Geospatial Tool and Geocloud Platform Innovations: A Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Assessment. Land. 10(6). 557–557. 16 indexed citations
3.
Degbelo, Auriol, et al.. (2021). SmartLandMaps : From customary tenure to land information systems. University of Twente Research Information. 1–12. 1 indexed citations
4.
Koeva, Mila, Claudia Stöcker, Sophie Crommelinck, et al.. (2020). Innovative Remote Sensing Methodologies for Kenyan Land Tenure Mapping. Remote Sensing. 12(2). 273–273. 43 indexed citations
5.
Flores, César Casiano, et al.. (2020). Governance assessment of the UAVs implementation in Rwanda under the fit-for-purpose land administration approach. Land Use Policy. 99. 104725–104725. 24 indexed citations
6.
Koeva, Mila, Claudia Stöcker, Sophie Crommelinck, et al.. (2020). Innovative Geospatial Solutions for Land Tenure Mapping. University of Twente Research Information. 3(1). 8 indexed citations
7.
Stöcker, Claudia, Francesco Nex, Mila Koeva, & M. Gerke. (2020). High-Quality UAV-Based Orthophotos for Cadastral Mapping: Guidance for Optimal Flight Configurations. Remote Sensing. 12(21). 3625–3625. 34 indexed citations
8.
Stöcker, Claudia, et al.. (2019). Unmanned Aerial System Imagery, Land Data and User Needs: A Socio-Technical Assessment in Rwanda. Remote Sensing. 11(9). 1035–1035. 19 indexed citations
9.
Stöcker, Claudia, Mila Koeva, & J.A. Zevenbergen. (2019). UAV Technology: Opportunities to Support the Updating Process of the Rwandan Cadastre. University of Twente Research Information. 1–14. 5 indexed citations
10.
Koeva, Mila, Sophie Crommelinck, Claudia Stöcker, et al.. (2019). Its4land – Innovative Geospatial Tools for Fit-for-Purpose Land Rights Mapping. University of Twente Research Information. 1–18. 1 indexed citations
11.
Stöcker, Claudia, Francesco Nex, Mila Koeva, & M. Gerke. (2019). UAV-BASED CADASTRAL MAPPING: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF FLIGHT PARAMETERS AND GROUND TRUTH MEASUREMENTS ON THE ABSOLUTE ACCURACY OF DERIVED ORTHOIMAGES. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. XLII-2/W13. 613–617. 10 indexed citations
12.
Stöcker, Claudia, Francesco Nex, Mila Koeva, & J.A. Zevenbergen. (2018). Data quality assessment of UAV-based products for land tenure recording in East Africa. University of Twente Research Information. 1–1. 1 indexed citations
13.
Koeva, Mila, Sophie Crommelinck, Claudia Stöcker, & Joep Crompvoets. (2018). Its4land - Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Innovative Geospatial Tools for Fit-For-Purpose Land Rights Mapping. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1–17. 4 indexed citations
14.
Stöcker, Claudia, et al.. (2018). Towards UAV-based Land Tenure Data Acquisition in Rwanda : Needs Assessment and Technology Response. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 9428. 3 indexed citations
15.
Stöcker, Claudia, Rohan Bennett, Francesco Nex, M. Gerke, & J.A. Zevenbergen. (2017). Review of the Current State of UAV Regulations. Remote Sensing. 9(5). 459–459. 422 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Stöcker, Claudia, Francesco Nex, Mila Koeva, & M. Gerke. (2017). QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF COMBINED IMU/GNSS DATA FOR DIRECT GEOREFERENCING IN THE CONTEXT OF UAV-BASED MAPPING. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. XLII-2/W6. 355–361. 61 indexed citations
17.
Koeva, Mila, Rohan Bennett, M. Gerke, et al.. (2017). TOWARDS INNOVATIVE GEOSPATIAL TOOLS FOR FIT-FOR-PURPOSE LAND RIGHTS MAPPING. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. XLII-2/W7. 37–43. 25 indexed citations
18.
Stöcker, Claudia, Anette Eltner, & Pierre Karrasch. (2015). Measuring gullies by synergetic application of UAV and close range photogrammetry — A case study from Andalusia, Spain. CATENA. 132. 1–11. 138 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026