Colleen Bee

677 total citations
20 papers, 466 citations indexed

About

Colleen Bee is a scholar working on Marketing, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Colleen Bee has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 466 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Marketing, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Colleen Bee's work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (11 papers), Media Influence and Health (8 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (4 papers). Colleen Bee is often cited by papers focused on Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (11 papers), Media Influence and Health (8 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (4 papers). Colleen Bee collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hong Kong. Colleen Bee's co-authors include Robert Madrigal, Lynn R. Kahle, Mark E. Havitz, Vassilis Dalakas, Donald O. Neubaum, Nefertiti Walker, K. Damon Aiken, Ulrich R. Orth, Keven Malkewitz and Jesse King and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, Cognition & Emotion and Journal of Advertising.

In The Last Decade

Colleen Bee

20 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Colleen Bee United States	11	261	199	187	116	77	20	466
Drue K. Schuler United States	5	242 0.9×	335 1.7×	107 0.6×	85 0.7×	21 0.3×	8	463
Joe Cobbs United States	13	322 1.2×	308 1.5×	264 1.4×	43 0.4×	158 2.1×	39	560
Ann Walsh United States	7	199 0.8×	281 1.4×	111 0.6×	71 0.6×	16 0.2×	10	435
Marjorie J. Caballero United States	8	225 0.9×	403 2.0×	176 0.9×	78 0.7×	9 0.1×	14	540
Robert S. Heiser United States	10	148 0.6×	185 0.9×	48 0.3×	60 0.5×	17 0.2×	18	306
Jesse N. Moore United States	7	199 0.8×	159 0.8×	49 0.3×	112 1.0×	16 0.2×	7	363
George Brooker	7	123 0.5×	228 1.1×	56 0.3×	53 0.5×	47 0.6×	10	399
Sarah M. Stanley United States	6	235 0.9×	299 1.5×	80 0.4×	81 0.7×	11 0.1×	8	404
John C. Schweitzer United States	9	137 0.5×	203 1.0×	103 0.6×	50 0.4×	10 0.1×	24	414
Rungpaka Amy Tiwsakul United Kingdom	7	250 1.0×	404 2.0×	76 0.4×	114 1.0×	16 0.2×	9	510

Countries citing papers authored by Colleen Bee

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colleen Bee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colleen Bee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colleen Bee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colleen Bee

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colleen Bee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colleen Bee. The network helps show where Colleen Bee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colleen Bee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colleen Bee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colleen Bee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colleen Bee. Colleen Bee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Faber, Aïda, et al.. (2022). The paradoxes of smartphone use: Understanding the user experience in today's connected world. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 56(3). 1260–1283. 6 indexed citations

Madrigal, Robert, et al.. (2022). When the Stakes are Low: How Key Features of Momentary Suspense Contribute to a Global Evaluation of Enjoyment. Communication Research. 50(3). 287–311. 1 indexed citations

Madrigal, Robert, et al.. (2022). Hope and fear in the experience of suspense. Cognition & Emotion. 36(6). 1074–1092. 2 indexed citations

Bee, Colleen, et al.. (2021). The simultaneous sponsorship of rival teams: Beyond ingroup favoritism and outgroup animosity. Psychology and Marketing. 6 indexed citations

Bee, Colleen, et al.. (2019). Are you with us or against us? The role of threat and anger in sport sponsorship. Journal of Business Research. 124. 698–707. 14 indexed citations

King, Jesse & Colleen Bee. (2019). Better in the (near) future: Group‐based differences in forecasting biases. European Journal of Social Psychology. 50(4). 749–765. 1 indexed citations

Aiken, K. Damon, Colleen Bee, & Nefertiti Walker. (2018). From passion to obsession: Development and validation of a scale to measure compulsive sport consumption. Journal of Business Research. 87. 69–79. 30 indexed citations

Bee, Colleen & Donald O. Neubaum. (2014). The role of cognitive appraisal and emotions of family members in the family business system. Journal of Family Business Strategy. 5(3). 323–333. 49 indexed citations

Bee, Colleen & Vassilis Dalakas. (2013). Rivalries and sponsor affiliation: Examining the effects of social identity and argument strength on responses to sponsorship-related advertising messages. Journal of Marketing Communications. 21(6). 408–424. 47 indexed citations

10.

Bee, Colleen & Robert Madrigal. (2013). Consumer uncertainty: The influence of anticipatory emotions on ambivalence, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 12(5). 370–381. 51 indexed citations

11.

Bee, Colleen & Robert Madrigal. (2012). Outcomes Are in the Eye of the Beholder. Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications. 24(4). 143–153. 8 indexed citations

12.

Bee, Colleen & Robert Madrigal. (2012). It's Not Whether You Win or Lose; It's How The Game is Played. Journal of Advertising. 41(1). 47–58. 26 indexed citations

13.

Madrigal, Robert, et al.. (2011). The Effect of Suspense on Enjoyment Following a Desirable Outcome: The Mediating Role of Relief. Media Psychology. 14(3). 259–288. 16 indexed citations

14.

Orth, Ulrich R., Keven Malkewitz, & Colleen Bee. (2010). Gender and Personality Drivers of Consumer Mixed Emotional Response to Advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising. 32(1). 69–80. 24 indexed citations

15.

Bee, Colleen & Mark E. Havitz. (2010). Exploring the relationship between involvement, fan attraction, psychological commitment and behavioural loyalty in a sports spectator context. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship. 11(2). 37–54. 74 indexed citations

16.

Bee, Colleen & Robert Madrigal. (2007). Coping With Mixed Emotions. ACR North American Advances. 2 indexed citations

17.

Bee, Colleen & Lynn R. Kahle. (2006). Relationship Marketing in Sports: A Functional Approach. Sport Marketing Quarterly. 15(2). 102–110. 84 indexed citations

18.

Madrigal, Robert & Colleen Bee. (2005). Suspense As an Experience of Mixed Emotions: Feelings of Hope and Fear While Watching Suspenseful Commercials. ACR North American Advances. 17 indexed citations

19.

Madrigal, Robert, et al.. (2005). Using the Olympics and FIFA World Cup to enhance global brand equity: a case study of two companies in the payment services category.. 179–190. 5 indexed citations

20.

Jones, Scott A., Colleen Bee, Rick Burton, & Lynn R. Kahle. (2003). Marketing Through Sports Entertainment: A Functional Approach. 309–322. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact