Ann Walsh

558 total citations
10 papers, 435 citations indexed

About

Ann Walsh is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann Walsh has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 435 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Marketing and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Ann Walsh's work include Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers). Ann Walsh is often cited by papers focused on Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers). Ann Walsh collaborates with scholars based in United States. Ann Walsh's co-authors include Les Carlson, Sanford Grossbart and Russell N. Laczniak and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Advertising and The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.

In The Last Decade

Ann Walsh

10 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ann Walsh United States	7	281	199	111	72	71	10	435
Ronald E. Taylor United States	8	197 0.7×	164 0.8×	66 0.6×	13 0.2×	47 0.7×	20	380
Abdullah J. Sultan Kuwait	7	184 0.7×	136 0.7×	65 0.6×	22 0.3×	34 0.5×	11	331
George Brooker	7	228 0.8×	123 0.6×	56 0.5×	21 0.3×	53 0.7×	10	399
Elizabeth Browne Canada	6	196 0.7×	116 0.6×	26 0.2×	60 0.8×	98 1.4×	7	341
Lucy L. Henke United States	11	104 0.4×	113 0.6×	59 0.5×	40 0.6×	33 0.5×	19	270
Kenneth Allan United States	7	65 0.2×	139 0.7×	98 0.9×	47 0.7×	22 0.3×	10	341
Michael L. Maynard United States	9	121 0.4×	115 0.6×	73 0.7×	14 0.2×	34 0.5×	24	306
Laura M. Milner United States	12	241 0.9×	200 1.0×	226 2.0×	9 0.1×	51 0.7×	24	498
Pierre Beaudoin Canada	9	546 1.9×	223 1.1×	63 0.6×	9 0.1×	72 1.0×	11	648
Guillaume D. Johnson United States	12	291 1.0×	254 1.3×	119 1.1×	11 0.2×	106 1.5×	24	490

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Walsh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Walsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Walsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Walsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Walsh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Walsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Walsh. The network helps show where Ann Walsh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Walsh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Walsh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Walsh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Walsh. Ann Walsh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Carlson, Les, Russell N. Laczniak, & Ann Walsh. (2001). Socializing children about television: An intergenerational study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 29(3). 276–288. 40 indexed citations

2.

Carlson, Les, Russell N. Laczniak, & Ann Walsh. (2001). Socializing Children about Television: An Intergenerational Study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 29(3). 277–289. 15 indexed citations

3.

Laczniak, Russell N., Les Carlson, & Ann Walsh. (1999). Exploring the Antecedents of Mothers’ Attitudes Toward the FCC’s Policy Statement on Toy-Based Programming. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 7(4). 59–69. 4 indexed citations

4.

Laczniak, Russell N., Les Carlson, & Ann Walsh. (1999). Antecedents of Mothers' Attitudes toward the FTC's Rule for 900-Number Advertising Directed at Children. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising. 21(2). 49–58. 3 indexed citations

5.

Walsh, Ann, Russell N. Laczniak, & Les Carlson. (1998). Mothers' Preferences for Regulating Children's Television. Journal of Advertising. 27(3). 23–36. 64 indexed citations

6.

Carlson, Les, Ann Walsh, Russell N. Laczniak, & Sanford Grossbart. (1994). Family Communication Patterns and Marketplace Motivations, Attitudes, and Behaviors of Children and Mothers. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 28(1). 25–53. 75 indexed citations

7.

Walsh, Ann. (1991). Intergenerational similarities, socialization and mother's and adolescent's marketplace orientations. Insecta mundi. 1 indexed citations

8.

Grossbart, Sanford, Les Carlson, & Ann Walsh. (1991). Consumer socialization and frequency of shopping with children. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 19(3). 155–163. 57 indexed citations

9.

Grossbart, Sanford, Les Carlson, & Ann Walsh. (1991). Consumer Socialization and Frequency of Shopping with Children. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 19(3). 155–163. 69 indexed citations

10.

Carlson, Les, Sanford Grossbart, & Ann Walsh. (1990). Mothers' Communication Orientation and Consumer-Socialization Tendencies. Journal of Advertising. 19(3). 27–38. 107 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact