Countries citing papers authored by Clive Chappell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Chappell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Chappell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Chappell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Chappell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Chappell. The network helps show where Clive Chappell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clive Chappell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clive Chappell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clive Chappell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Clive Chappell. Clive Chappell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chappell, Clive, Hermine Scheeres, David Boud, & Donna Rooney. (2009). Working out work: Integrated development practices in organizations. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 175–188.5 indexed citations
2.
Clayton, Berwyn, Roger Harris, & Clive Chappell. (2008). Supporting vocational education and training providers in building capability for the future: research activity overviews. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).4 indexed citations
3.
Chappell, Clive, et al.. (2008). Investigating Learning through Work: The Development of the "Provider Learning Environment Scale".. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.
4.
Chappell, Clive, et al.. (2008). Investigating Learning through Work: What the Literature Says. Support Document.. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.1 indexed citations
5.
Mitchell, John, et al.. (2006). Quality Is the Key: Critical Issues in Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Vocational Education and Training.. OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney).16 indexed citations
6.
Chappell, Clive. (2005). Investigating learning and work. OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney).2 indexed citations
7.
Chappell, Clive. (2003). An industry-led VET system: where to from here?.1 indexed citations
Chappell, Clive. (2003). Changing pedagogy: the changing context.1 indexed citations
13.
Chappell, Clive & Robyn Johnston. (2003). Changing Work: Changing Roles for Vocational Education and Training Teachers and Trainers..26 indexed citations
14.
Chappell, Clive. (2001). Issues of Teacher Identity in a Restructuring Australian Vocational Education and Training (VET) System.. OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney). 9(1). 21–39.9 indexed citations
15.
McIntyre, John, Clive Chappell, Hermine Scheeres, et al.. (2000). The RAVL symposium: New questions about work and learning.3 indexed citations
16.
Chappell, Clive, Lesley Farrell, Hermine Scheeres, & Nicky Solomon. (2000). The organization of identity: four cases. 135–153.4 indexed citations
17.
Chappell, Clive. (1998). Changing TAFE in new times. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 23(2).1 indexed citations
Chappell, Clive. (1996). Post-compulsory Education and Training: A Modernist Project.. Korean Society for the Study of Vocational Education. 4(1). 14–34.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.