Christopher Bryant

4.2k total citations · 7 hit papers
32 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Christopher Bryant is a scholar working on Ecology, Food Science and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher Bryant has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Ecology, 19 papers in Food Science and 9 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Christopher Bryant's work include Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (25 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (17 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers). Christopher Bryant is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (25 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (17 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers). Christopher Bryant collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Christopher Bryant's co-authors include Julie Barnett, Keri Szejda, Hermes Sanctorum, V. D. Deshpande, Shulamit Levenberg, Mark J. Post, David L. Kaplan, Nicholas J. Genovese, Panagiota Moutsatsou and Nicole E. Negowetti and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Animal Science.

In The Last Decade

Christopher Bryant

31 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Hit Papers

Scientific, sustainability and regulatory challenges of c... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2020 2019 2018 2020 2019 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Christopher Bryant United Kingdom 20 2.0k 1.6k 585 398 390 32 3.0k
Filiep Vanhonacker Belgium 33 780 0.4× 1.8k 1.1× 692 1.2× 1.2k 2.9× 868 2.2× 50 4.0k
Sergiy Smetana Germany 32 1.1k 0.5× 1.1k 0.7× 340 0.6× 308 0.8× 355 0.9× 102 3.6k
Hans Dagevos Netherlands 28 1.5k 0.8× 1.5k 0.9× 231 0.4× 745 1.9× 965 2.5× 72 3.8k
Annet C. Hoek Australia 19 1.0k 0.5× 1.4k 0.8× 281 0.5× 506 1.3× 459 1.2× 31 2.4k
Ellen J. Van Loo Belgium 28 1.1k 0.6× 1.3k 0.8× 284 0.5× 1.3k 3.2× 1.2k 3.1× 58 3.5k
Øydis Ueland Norway 27 339 0.2× 1.0k 0.6× 453 0.8× 466 1.2× 298 0.8× 71 2.4k
Hanna Schösler Netherlands 12 984 0.5× 838 0.5× 117 0.2× 401 1.0× 454 1.2× 19 2.0k
Giovanni Sogari Italy 31 543 0.3× 746 0.5× 159 0.3× 538 1.4× 713 1.8× 65 3.3k
Marleen C. Onwezen Netherlands 25 838 0.4× 940 0.6× 143 0.2× 490 1.2× 1.4k 3.6× 50 3.4k
Ada Braghieri Italy 30 437 0.2× 898 0.6× 1.3k 2.3× 379 1.0× 162 0.4× 111 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Bryant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Bryant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Bryant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Bryant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Bryant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Bryant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Bryant. The network helps show where Christopher Bryant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Bryant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Bryant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Bryant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Bryant. Christopher Bryant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2025). Farmed fish welfare in Egypt: Surveying current practices and future directions for tilapia culture. Aquaculture Reports. 41. 102594–102594. 2 indexed citations
2.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2024). Exploring public support for farmed animal welfare policy and advocacy across 23 countries. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 3 indexed citations
3.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2024). A review of policy levers to reduce meat production and consumption. Appetite. 203. 107684–107684. 18 indexed citations
4.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2023). Every little helps: exploring meat and animal product consumption in the Tesco 1.0 dataset. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1).
5.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2022). Plant‐based meats in China: a cross‐sectional study of attitudes and behaviours. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 36(3). 1090–1100. 14 indexed citations
6.
Bryant, Christopher. (2022). Plant-based animal product alternatives are healthier and more environmentally sustainable than animal products. Future Foods. 6. 100174–100174. 177 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2022). Nomenclature of cell-cultivated meat & seafood products. npj Science of Food. 6(1). 56–56. 23 indexed citations
8.
Hassoun, Abdo, Fatma Boukid, Antonella Pasqualone, et al.. (2022). Emerging trends in the agri-food sector: Digitalisation and shift to plant-based diets. Current Research in Food Science. 5. 2261–2269. 60 indexed citations
9.
Bryant, Christopher & Cor van der Weele. (2021). The farmers’ dilemma: Meat, means, and morality. Appetite. 167. 105605–105605. 20 indexed citations
10.
Bryant, Christopher, Annayah Miranda Beatrice Prosser, & Julie Barnett. (2021). Going veggie: Identifying and overcoming the social and psychological barriers to veganism. Appetite. 169. 105812–105812. 32 indexed citations
11.
Bryant, Christopher & Hermes Sanctorum. (2021). Alternative proteins, evolving attitudes: Comparing consumer attitudes to plant-based and cultured meat in Belgium in two consecutive years. Appetite. 161. 105161–105161. 182 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Bryant, Christopher & Julie Barnett. (2020). Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: An Updated Review (2018–2020). Applied Sciences. 10(15). 5201–5201. 240 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Post, Mark J., Shulamit Levenberg, David L. Kaplan, et al.. (2020). Scientific, sustainability and regulatory challenges of cultured meat. Nature Food. 1(7). 403–415. 487 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Bryant, Christopher & Julie Barnett. (2019). What's in a name? Consumer perceptions of in vitro meat under different names. Appetite. 137. 104–113. 204 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2019). Strategies for overcoming aversion to unnaturalness: The case of clean meat. Meat Science. 154. 37–45. 91 indexed citations
16.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2019). The Impact of Framing on Acceptance of Cultured Meat. Frontiers in Nutrition. 6. 103–103. 170 indexed citations
17.
Bryant, Christopher. (2019). We Can’t Keep Meating Like This: Attitudes towards Vegetarian and Vegan Diets in the United Kingdom. Sustainability. 11(23). 6844–6844. 163 indexed citations
18.
Bryant, Christopher & Julie Barnett. (2018). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review. Meat Science. 143. 8–17. 358 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2018). A cross-country survey on the appeal of plant-based and clean meat in China, India, and the USA. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
20.
Bryant, Christopher, et al.. (2013). Mapping the Genetic Variation of Regional Brain Volumes as Explained by All Common SNPs from the ADNI Study. PLoS ONE. 8(8). e71723–e71723. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026