Cheryl Leo

1.1k citations
27 papers · 808 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Cheryl Leo

27 papers receiving 767 citations

Peers

Cheryl Leo
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Marketing 406
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 286
  • Business and International Management 39
  • Applied Psychology 96
  • Information Systems and Management 97
Replace Marie‐Louise Fry with:
Marie‐Louise Fry Australia
Jerónimo García‐Fernández Spain
Robert D. Jewell United States
Bryan Hochstein United States
Nadia Zainuddin Australia
Julie Tinson United Kingdom
Frederick G. Crane United States
Mark Mulder United States
Debasis Pradhan India
M. Dhurup South Africa
Cheryl Leo relative to Marie‐Louise Fry Australia Marie‐Louise Fry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Marie‐Louise Fry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Leo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Leo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Leo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Leo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Leo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Leo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Leo. The network helps show where Cheryl Leo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Leo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Leo Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Leo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005119
2 201981
3 201775
4 201548
5 201547
6 201345
7 201540
8 201934
9 201333
10 201733
11 201530
12 201228
13 201725
14 201624
15 202224
16 201722
17 202120
18 202218
19 201314
20 201914

About Cheryl Leo

Cheryl Leo is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 808 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (13 papers), Service and Product Innovation (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (3 papers) and Psychology of Social Influence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (406 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (286 citations), Business and International Management (39 citations), Applied Psychology (96 citations) and Information Systems and Management (97 citations). Cheryl Leo has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Taiwan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rebekah Russell‐Bennett, Charmine E. J. Härtel, Cindy Yunhsin Chou, Sharyn Rundle‐Thiele, G Laud, Yelena Tsarenko, Timo Dietrich, Denni Arli, Herman H. M. Tse and Tom Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Services Marketing, Journal of service management, Journal of Business Research, Health Education and International Journal of Consumer Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact