Chad Navis

14 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Le...201020262015202020102011200400600

Peers

Chad Navis
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 807
  • Strategy and Management 710
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 708
  • Sociology and Political Science 421
  • Accounting 388
Replace Tyler Wry with:
Tyler Wry United States
Stanislav D. Dobrev United States
Maxim Voronov Canada
Monica A. Zimmerman United States
Gry Agnete Alsos Norway
Zannie Giraud Voss United States
Israel Drori Israel
Lew Perren United Kingdom
Antoaneta P. Petkova United States
MariaLaura Di Domenico United Kingdom
Chad Navis relative to Tyler Wry United States Tyler Wry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Tyler Wry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chad Navis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad Navis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad Navis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad Navis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad Navis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad Navis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad Navis. The network helps show where Chad Navis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chad Navis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chad Navis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chad Navis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chad Navis. Chad Navis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 0
4 15
5 41
6 22
7 24
8 2
9 110
10 31
11 176
12
The Market That Wasn't: The Non-emergence of the Online Grocery Category
11
13 79
14 309
15
Legitimate Distinctiveness and the Entrepreneurial Identity: Influence on Investor Judgments of New Venture Plausibility.breakdown →
380
16
How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990–2005breakdown →
652

About Chad Navis

Chad Navis is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (7 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (708 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (807 citations) and Business and International Management (130 citations). Chad Navis has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Mary Ann Glynn, Theodore L. Waldron, Greg Fisher, Gideon D. Markman, Elizabeth P. Karam, Jeffrey G. York, Desirée F. Pacheco, Sheela Pandey, Ryan Raffaelli and Matthew Wood. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Administrative Science Quarterly and Journal of Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026