C. Otto Scharmer

14 papers receiving 836 citations

Peers

C. Otto Scharmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 273
  • Education 236
  • Sociology and Political Science 218
  • Management Science and Operations Research 163
  • Strategy and Management 156
Replace Herman Van Den Broeck with:
Herman Van Den Broeck Belgium
Max Visser Netherlands
Ken Parry Australia
Wilfred H. Drath United States
Marty Linsky United States
Iain L. Densten Australia
Bernard McKenna Australia
Øyvind Lund Martinsen Norway
Thomas H. Stone United States
Neharika Vohra India
C. Otto Scharmer relative to Herman Van Den Broeck Belgium Herman Van Den Broeck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Herman Van Den Broeck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Otto Scharmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Otto Scharmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Otto Scharmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Otto Scharmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Otto Scharmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Otto Scharmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Otto Scharmer. The network helps show where C. Otto Scharmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Otto Scharmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Otto Scharmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Otto Scharmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Otto Scharmer. C. Otto Scharmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 17
3
Leading from the Emerging Future: From Ego-System to Eco-System Economies
174
4 40
5
Theory U : leading from the futures as it emerges : the social technology of presencing
56
6 21
7
Theory U: Leading from the Future as it Emerges
302
8
Presence : Human Purpose and the Field of the Future
236
9
Presence: An Exploration of Profound Change in People, Organizations, and Society
115
10 2
11 10
12 129
13 3
14
Universities As the Birthplace for the Entrepreneuring Human Being
7
15
Three Gestures of Becoming Aware
2

About C. Otto Scharmer

C. Otto Scharmer is a scholar working on General Social Sciences, Management of Technology and Innovation and Strategy and Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (273 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (34 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (99 citations). C. Otto Scharmer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Senge, Betty S. Flowers, Kathryn Pavlovich, Jay B. Barney, Edgar H. Schein, Adam Kahane and Falko von Ameln. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Knowledge Management, Journal of Business Strategy and Journal of Management Spirituality & Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026