Bradley A. Winn

518 total citations
10 papers, 318 citations indexed

About

Bradley A. Winn is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Bradley A. Winn has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 318 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Management Information Systems, 2 papers in Information Systems and Management and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Bradley A. Winn's work include Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers), Education and Military Integration (2 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (2 papers). Bradley A. Winn is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers), Education and Military Integration (2 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (2 papers). Bradley A. Winn collaborates with scholars based in United States. Bradley A. Winn's co-authors include Kim S. Cameron, Jason Kanov, David S. Bright and Jeff E. Hoyt and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Research in Higher Education and Deep Blue (University of Michigan).

In The Last Decade

Bradley A. Winn

9 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Bradley A. Winn United States	5	113	78	74	64	58	10	318
Ian Ashman United Kingdom	10	139 1.2×	45 0.6×	26 0.4×	38 0.6×	24 0.4×	17	398
Chris Perryer Australia	8	186 1.6×	42 0.5×	34 0.5×	68 1.1×	40 0.7×	17	352
Svein Tvedt Johansen Norway	6	133 1.2×	56 0.7×	15 0.2×	43 0.7×	22 0.4×	15	287
B. Charles Tatum United States	9	230 2.0×	38 0.5×	34 0.5×	95 1.5×	44 0.8×	21	425
Constance Campbell United States	12	171 1.5×	52 0.7×	40 0.5×	113 1.8×	16 0.3×	23	354
Mary Sue Love United States	10	167 1.5×	47 0.6×	56 0.8×	107 1.7×	33 0.6×	15	375
Jay J. Caughron United States	8	177 1.6×	39 0.5×	26 0.4×	108 1.7×	23 0.4×	9	389
J. Thomas Whetstone United Kingdom	4	188 1.7×	174 2.2×	24 0.3×	48 0.8×	96 1.7×	6	384
Louis P. White United States	9	200 1.8×	104 1.3×	14 0.2×	41 0.6×	37 0.6×	19	367
Jeri Mullins Beggs United States	7	78 0.7×	135 1.7×	91 1.2×	40 0.6×	15 0.3×	8	330

Countries citing papers authored by Bradley A. Winn

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bradley A. Winn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bradley A. Winn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bradley A. Winn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bradley A. Winn

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bradley A. Winn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bradley A. Winn. The network helps show where Bradley A. Winn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bradley A. Winn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bradley A. Winn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bradley A. Winn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bradley A. Winn. Bradley A. Winn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Bright, David S., et al.. (2025). We Need Deep Theories of Virtues: Four Principles for Advancing Research on Virtues in Positive Social Science. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. 10(1). 1 indexed citations

2.

Bright, David S., Bradley A. Winn, & Jason Kanov. (2013). Reconsidering Virtue: Differences of Perspective in Virtue Ethics and the Positive Social Sciences. Journal of Business Ethics. 119(4). 445–460. 115 indexed citations

3.

Bright, David S., Bradley A. Winn, & Jason Kanov. (2012). Virtue, Virtuousness or Vice: Three Conceptual Tensions in Positive Organizational Scholarship. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2012(1). 12717–12717. 1 indexed citations

4.

Cameron, Kim S. & Bradley A. Winn. (2011). Virtuousness in Organizations. Oxford University Press eBooks. 57 indexed citations

5.

Winn, Bradley A., et al.. (2005). Evaluating the Success of Strategic Change against Kotter's Eight Steps.. Planning for higher education. 33(2). 15–22. 1 indexed citations

6.

Hoyt, Jeff E. & Bradley A. Winn. (2004). Understanding Retention and College Student Bodies: Differences Between Drop-Outs, Stop-Outs, Opt-Outs, and Transfer-Outs. NASPA Journal. 41(3). 15 indexed citations

7.

Hoyt, Jeff E. & Bradley A. Winn. (2004). Understanding Retention and College Student Bodies: Differences Between Drop-Outs, Stop-Outs, Opt-Outs, and Transfer-Outs. NASPA Journal. 41(3). 395–417. 52 indexed citations

8.

Winn, Bradley A. & Kim S. Cameron. (1998). An Examination of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Framework. 1 indexed citations

9.

Winn, Bradley A. & Kim S. Cameron. (1998). ORGANIZATIONAL QUALITY: An Examination of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Framework. Research in Higher Education. 39(5). 491–512. 74 indexed citations

10.

Winn, Bradley A.. (1996). Organizational quality in higher education: An examination of the Baldrige framework in the university work environment.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact