Constance Campbell

535 total citations
23 papers, 354 citations indexed

About

Constance Campbell is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Constance Campbell has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 354 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 7 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Constance Campbell's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). Constance Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). Constance Campbell collaborates with scholars based in United States. Constance Campbell's co-authors include Cathy Owens Swift, Mark J. Martinko, John W. Henry, Scott Douglas, Paige Rutner, Cynthia K. Riemenschneider, Bill C. Hardgrave and D. Harrison McKnight and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Management, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Sex Roles.

In The Last Decade

Constance Campbell

21 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Constance Campbell United States	12	171	113	73	52	47	23	354
Virginia K. Bratton United States	9	186 1.1×	128 1.1×	78 1.1×	42 0.8×	48 1.0×	14	373
Robert Steinbauer Canada	8	126 0.7×	93 0.8×	59 0.8×	52 1.0×	24 0.5×	13	307
Sharon L. Wagner United States	7	195 1.1×	94 0.8×	79 1.1×	34 0.7×	64 1.4×	9	356
Jay J. Caughron United States	8	177 1.0×	108 1.0×	63 0.9×	39 0.8×	78 1.7×	9	389
Sabrina Deutsch Salamon Canada	4	264 1.5×	145 1.3×	153 2.1×	68 1.3×	63 1.3×	7	446
Evan H. Offstein United States	10	87 0.5×	100 0.9×	95 1.3×	47 0.9×	78 1.7×	35	398
Leslie M. Fine United States	13	197 1.2×	81 0.7×	103 1.4×	43 0.8×	47 1.0×	19	350
Yu Ha Cheung Hong Kong	7	149 0.9×	114 1.0×	74 1.0×	21 0.4×	89 1.9×	12	382
Jenny S. Wesche Germany	8	309 1.8×	152 1.3×	112 1.5×	35 0.7×	105 2.2×	17	520
Luis M. Arciniega Mexico	9	155 0.9×	116 1.0×	78 1.1×	39 0.8×	35 0.7×	21	299

Countries citing papers authored by Constance Campbell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance Campbell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Campbell. The network helps show where Constance Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Constance Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Constance Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Constance Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Constance Campbell. Constance Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Campbell, Constance, et al.. (2019). In Their Own Words: The Career Stories of Women Leaders in STEM Professions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

Campbell, Constance, et al.. (2019). The Capacious Model and Leader Identity: An Integrative Framework. Journal of Leadership Studies. 13(1). 6–19. 3 indexed citations

Rutner, Paige, et al.. (2015). The Politics of Emotion. ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems. 46(3). 52–73. 7 indexed citations

Campbell, Constance, et al.. (2013). Leader derailment: the impact of self‐defeating behaviors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 34(1). 85–97. 8 indexed citations

Campbell, Constance, et al.. (2012). Leader Derailment in Academe: Does the Training Match the Problem. 8(1). 43–48.

Campbell, Constance, et al.. (2011). Incivility in Academe: What if the Instigator is a High Performer?. Journal of Management Policy and Practice. 14(1). 35–52. 3 indexed citations

Campbell, Constance, et al.. (2009). Dementors in Our Midst: Managing the Highly Productive but Morale-Killing Employee. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship. 14(1). 3–25. 4 indexed citations

Campbell, Constance. (2007). On the journey toward wholeness in leader theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 28(2). 137–153. 11 indexed citations

Campbell, Constance & Cathy Owens Swift. (2006). Attributional Comparisons Across Biases and Leader-Member Exchange Status. Journal of managerial issues. 18(3). 393. 19 indexed citations

10.

Campbell, Constance. (2006). Perceptions of Compressed Video Distance Learning (DL) Across Location and Levels of Instruction in Business Courses. Journal of Education for Business. 81(3). 170–174. 12 indexed citations

11.

Campbell, Constance, et al.. (2006). Leadership, management, and derailment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 27(3). 190–202. 36 indexed citations

12.

Campbell, Constance. (2004). A Longitudinal Study of One Organization’s Culture: Do Values Endure?. Mid-American Journal of Business. 19(2). 41–52. 19 indexed citations

13.

Martinko, Mark J., Constance Campbell, & Scott Douglas. (2000). Bias in the Social Science Publication Process: Are There Exceptions?. Journal of social behavior and personality. 15(1). 1. 13 indexed citations

14.

Campbell, Constance, et al.. (2000). Cheating Goes Hi-Tech: Online Term Paper Mills. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 24(6). 726–740. 30 indexed citations

15.

Campbell, Constance & John W. Henry. (1999). Gender Differences in Self-Attributions: Relationship of Gender to Attributional Consistency, Style, and Expectations for Performance in a College Course. Sex Roles. 41(1-2). 95–104. 23 indexed citations

16.

Swift, Cathy Owens & Constance Campbell. (1998). Psychological Climate: Relevance for Sales Managers and Impact on Consequent Job Satisfaction. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 6(1). 27–37. 32 indexed citations

17.

Campbell, Constance & Mark J. Martinko. (1998). An Integrative Attributional Perspective of Empowerment and Learned Helplessness: A Multimethod Field Study. Journal of Management. 24(2). 173–200. 49 indexed citations

18.

Swift, Cathy Owens & Constance Campbell. (1995). The Impact of Leader-member Exchange Relationships on the Performance Attributions of Sales Managers. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 15(4). 45. 8 indexed citations

19.

Swift, Cathy Owens & Constance Campbell. (1995). The Effect of Vertical Exchange Relationships on the Performance Attributions and Subsequent Actions of Sales Managers. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 15(4). 45–56. 12 indexed citations

20.

Campbell, Constance, et al.. (1976). Women's nature and privilege. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact