Bob Elliott
- Education top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Demography
- Co-authors
- James CalderheadMartha E. WadsworthMarcus RichardsIan MacPhersonHitendra PillayRoss BrookerTania AsplandAlex McConnachie
- Topics
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (7 papers)Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (4 papers)Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Bob Elliott
20 papers receiving 225 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Education 191
- Sociology and Political Science 65
- Social Psychology 27
- General Health Professions 25
- Demography 25
Countries citing papers authored by Bob Elliott
This map shows the geographic impact of Bob Elliott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bob Elliott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bob Elliott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bob Elliott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bob Elliott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bob Elliott. The network helps show where Bob Elliott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bob Elliott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bob Elliott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bob Elliott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bob Elliott. Bob Elliott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | Enhancing the Profile of Teachers as Curriculum Decision-Makers: Some International Perspectives. | 1 |
| 10 | 48 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Establishing and Sustaining a Critical and Reconstructive Network of Engagement in and about Curriculum Leadership through the Use of Narrative and Conversation. | 3 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Using an NPDP experience to propose a changing conception of professional development | 1 |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Bob Elliott
Bob Elliott is a scholar working on Education, Museology and Demography, having authored 23 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (7 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (4 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (191 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (11 citations) and Demography (25 citations). Bob Elliott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include James Calderhead, Martha E. Wadsworth, Marcus Richards, Ian MacPherson, Hitendra Pillay, Ross Brooker, Tania Aspland, Alex McConnachie, Matt Sutton and Stephen Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Teachers and Teaching and Medical Hypotheses.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.