Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents
19903.1k citationsMary Jo Bitner, Bernard H. Booms et al.Journal of Marketingprofile →
The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents
19901.7k citationsMary Jo Bitner, Bernard H. Booms et al.Journal of Marketingprofile →
Critical Service Encounters: The Employee's Viewpoint
19941.2k citationsMary Jo Bitner, Bernard H. Booms et al.Journal of Marketingprofile →
Critical Service Encounters: The Employee's Viewpoint
1994645 citationsMary Jo Bitner, Bernard H. Booms et al.Journal of Marketingprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Bernard H. Booms
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bernard H. Booms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernard H. Booms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernard H. Booms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bernard H. Booms
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernard H. Booms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernard H. Booms. The network helps show where Bernard H. Booms may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bernard H. Booms
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bernard H. Booms.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bernard H. Booms based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bernard H. Booms. Bernard H. Booms is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Booms, Bernard H. & D. Lynne Kaltreider. (2016). Computer-Aided Instruction for Large Elementary Courses. American Economic Review. 64(2). 408–413.
2.
Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, & Lois A. Mohr. (1994). Critical Service Encounters: The Employee's Viewpoint. Journal of Marketing. 58(4). 95–106.645 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, & Lois A. Mohr. (1994). Critical Service Encounters: The Employee's Viewpoint. Journal of Marketing. 58(4). 95–95.1155 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Bitner, Mary Jo, et al.. (1990). The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents. Journal of Marketing. 54(1). 71–84.1651 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Bitner, Mary Jo, et al.. (1990). The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents. Journal of Marketing. 54(1). 71–71.3099 indexed citations breakdown →
Booms, Bernard H.. (1976). Modelos econômicos na analise de política pública. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).1 indexed citations
Booms, Bernard H. & Teh‐wei Hu. (1971). Toward a Positive Theory of State and Local Public Expenditures: An Empirical Example. Public finance. 26(3). 419–436.1 indexed citations
16.
Booms, Bernard H.. (1971). The black M.B.A. Business Horizons. 14(6). 47–53.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.