Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms

489 indexed citations
published 1981
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w53942796 →

Countries where authors are citing Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms.

About Marketing Strategies and Organizational Structures for Service Firms

This paper, published in 1981, received 489 indexed citations . Written by Bernard H. Booms and Mary Jo Bitner. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (306 citations), Marketing (295 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (142 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w53942796.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026