Barbara King

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
24 papers, 997 citations indexed

About

Barbara King is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Barbara King has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 997 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Education, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Barbara King's work include Higher Education Research Studies (6 papers), Career Development and Diversity (5 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers). Barbara King is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Research Studies (6 papers), Career Development and Diversity (5 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers). Barbara King collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Barbara King's co-authors include Catherine Riegle‐Crumb, Yasmiyn Irizarry, Chandra Muller, Eric Grodsky, Carmen Petrick Smith, Chelsea Moore, Patrick K. Moonan, Stephen E. Weis, Janice M. Pogoda and Janet Emig and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and American Educational Research Journal.

In The Last Decade

Barbara King

22 papers receiving 921 citations

Hit Papers

Does STEM Stand Out? Examining Racial/Ethnic Gaps in Pers... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Barbara King United States 11 568 428 243 143 135 24 997
Katherine P. Dabney United States 10 415 0.7× 425 1.0× 212 0.9× 101 0.7× 74 0.5× 16 795
Patricia B. Campbell United States 13 510 0.9× 425 1.0× 106 0.4× 167 1.2× 177 1.3× 48 1.0k
Christopher B. Newman United States 14 654 1.2× 476 1.1× 124 0.5× 268 1.9× 67 0.5× 29 1.2k
Katherine Schultz United States 12 553 1.0× 223 0.5× 75 0.3× 82 0.6× 62 0.5× 37 886
Christine R. Starr United States 12 217 0.4× 263 0.6× 202 0.8× 111 0.8× 206 1.5× 34 701
Greg W. Welch United States 11 305 0.5× 153 0.4× 98 0.4× 74 0.5× 44 0.3× 18 653
Joseph R. Cimpian United States 14 473 0.8× 177 0.4× 211 0.9× 259 1.8× 186 1.4× 35 1.0k
Allison J. Gonsalves Canada 13 294 0.5× 251 0.6× 72 0.3× 71 0.5× 72 0.5× 32 543
Emily J. Shaw United States 15 464 0.8× 139 0.3× 203 0.8× 114 0.8× 29 0.2× 52 811
Tony Perez United States 16 662 1.2× 471 1.1× 706 2.9× 509 3.6× 54 0.4× 28 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara King. The network helps show where Barbara King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara King. Barbara King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
King, Barbara, et al.. (2024). Sharing the Work: Using Diversity Advocates to Develop Inclusive Excellence. Innovative Higher Education. 49(4). 683–705. 1 indexed citations
2.
King, Barbara & Carmen Petrick Smith. (2020). Using Project-Based Learning to Develop Teachers for Leadership. The Clearing House A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas. 93(3). 158–164. 25 indexed citations
3.
Riegle‐Crumb, Catherine, Barbara King, & Yasmiyn Irizarry. (2019). Does STEM Stand Out? Examining Racial/Ethnic Gaps in Persistence Across Postsecondary Fields. Educational Researcher. 48(3). 133–144. 235 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
King, Barbara. (2019). Using Teaching Through Problem Solving to Transform In-Service Teachers’ Thinking about Instruction. Mathematics teacher education and development. 21(1). 169–189. 4 indexed citations
5.
King, Barbara, et al.. (2019). The Problem-Based Threshold: Shifting Pre-Service Teachers’ Thinking About Mathematics Instruction. The Teacher Educator. 55(1). 88–106. 2 indexed citations
6.
King, Barbara, et al.. (2019). After Presenting Multiple Solution Strategies, What’s Next? Examining the Mathematical Connections Made by Preservice Teachers. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(2). 9–20. 2 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Carmen Petrick, et al.. (2016). Using Multimodal Learning Analytics to Identify Patterns of Interactions in a Body-Based Mathematics Activity. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 27(4). 355–379. 10 indexed citations
8.
Riegle‐Crumb, Catherine, Barbara King, & Chelsea Moore. (2016). Do They Stay or Do They Go? The Switching Decisions of Individuals Who Enter Gender Atypical College Majors. Sex Roles. 74(9-10). 436–449. 33 indexed citations
9.
King, Barbara. (2016). Does Postsecondary Persistence in STEM Vary by Gender?. AERA Open. 2(4). 18 indexed citations
10.
King, Barbara, et al.. (2016). Promoting Student Buy-in: Using Writing to Develop Mathematical Understanding. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 13(2). 6 indexed citations
11.
King, Barbara. (2015). Changing College Majors: Does It Happen More in STEM and Do Grades Matter?. Journal of College Science Teaching. 44(3). 44–51. 38 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Carmen Petrick, Barbara King, & Diana Gil‐González. (2015). The STEAM behind the Scenes. Teaching Children Mathematics. 22(1). 46–49. 2 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Carmen Petrick, et al.. (2014). Learning angles through movement: Critical actions for developing understanding in an embodied activity. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 36. 95–108. 64 indexed citations
14.
Riegle‐Crumb, Catherine, Barbara King, Eric Grodsky, & Chandra Muller. (2012). The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same? Prior Achievement Fails to Explain Gender Inequality in Entry Into STEM College Majors Over Time. American Educational Research Journal. 49(6). 1048–1073. 258 indexed citations
15.
Riegle‐Crumb, Catherine & Barbara King. (2010). Questioning a White Male Advantage in STEM. Educational Researcher. 39(9). 656–664. 226 indexed citations
16.
King, Barbara. (2003). Book Review: Language development: circle time sessions to improve communication skills. Child Language Teaching and Therapy. 19(2). 232–234. 1 indexed citations
17.
Weis, Stephen E., et al.. (2001). Tuberculosis in the Foreign-Born Population of Tarrant County, Texas by Immigration Status. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 164(6). 953–957. 39 indexed citations
18.
Moray, Neville, et al.. (1987). A Closed-Loop Causal Model of Workload Based on a Comparison of Fuzzy and Crisp Mesaurement Techniques. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 29(3). 339–348. 7 indexed citations
19.
King, Barbara, et al.. (1983). The Relative Effectiveness of Writing Assignments in an Elementary Algebra Course for College Students.. 1 indexed citations
20.
Emig, Janet & Barbara King. (1979). Emig-King Attitude Scale for Students.. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026