Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A longitudinal study
2021442 citationsAriel Fridman, Rachel Gershon et al.PLoS ONEprofile →
Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity
This map shows the geographic impact of Ayelet Gneezy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ayelet Gneezy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ayelet Gneezy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ayelet Gneezy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ayelet Gneezy. The network helps show where Ayelet Gneezy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ayelet Gneezy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ayelet Gneezy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ayelet Gneezy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ayelet Gneezy. Ayelet Gneezy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Keenan, Elizabeth A., Silvia Saccardo, & Ayelet Gneezy. (2017). Overcoming Overhead Aversion With Choice. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
8.
Keenan, Elizabeth A. & Ayelet Gneezy. (2016). Understanding and Overcoming Overhead Aversion in Charity. ACR North American Advances.7 indexed citations
Gneezy, Ayelet & Alex Imas. (2015). Poverty As Helplessness: How Loss of Control Affects Impulsivity and Risk-Taking. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
12.
Saccardo, Silvia, et al.. (2015). Shifting Mindset in Consumer Elective Pricing. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
13.
Katz, Hagai, et al.. (2014). “Talk Is Cheap”: the Discrepancy Between Self and Next-Of-Kin Organ Donation Decisions. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
14.
Nelson, Leif D., et al.. (2014). Paying more when paying for others.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 107(3). 414–431.58 indexed citations
Gneezy, Ayelet, Uri Gneezy, & Leif D. Nelson. (2011). Social Preferences and Charitable Giving: How Pay-What-You-Want Pricing Can Optimize Social Welfare. ACR North American Advances.
17.
Gneezy, Ayelet, Uri Gneezy, Leif D. Nelson, & Amber Brown. (2010). Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
18.
Shu, Suzanne B. & Ayelet Gneezy. (2009). Procrastination of Enjoyable Experiences. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
19.
Gneezy, Ayelet, Ziv Carmon, & Leif D. Nelson. (2009). Getting Less Than You Pay For: Very High Prices Lead to Inferences of Very Low Quality. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
20.
Gneezy, Ayelet. (2005). Attitudes and Promotions. ACR North American Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.