Mark Daniel

950 total citations
12 papers, 613 citations indexed

About

Mark Daniel is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Daniel has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 613 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Mark Daniel's work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). Mark Daniel is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). Mark Daniel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ukraine and Germany. Mark Daniel's co-authors include Douglas K. Detterman, Dean C. Delis, Joel H. Kramer, Aurelio Prifitera, Joseph D. Matarazzo, Dustin Wahlstrom, Charlie Miller, Elfrieda H. Hiebert, Wilfred van Gorp and Paul Satz and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Intelligence.

In The Last Decade

Mark Daniel

12 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Daniel United States	9	302	167	161	94	68	12	613
Thierry Lecerf Switzerland	16	379 1.3×	271 1.6×	211 1.3×	126 1.3×	103 1.5×	55	1.0k
Jean‐Luc Roulin France	17	152 0.5×	222 1.3×	192 1.2×	155 1.6×	39 0.6×	45	654
Irene Rebollo Netherlands	15	464 1.5×	243 1.5×	191 1.2×	113 1.2×	84 1.2×	24	913
Corentin Gonthier France	16	346 1.1×	417 2.5×	198 1.2×	91 1.0×	78 1.1×	47	819
Phyllis H. Williams United Kingdom	3	238 0.8×	412 2.5×	125 0.8×	118 1.3×	65 1.0×	4	662
Kees‐Jan Kan Netherlands	15	540 1.8×	347 2.1×	118 0.7×	120 1.3×	110 1.6×	38	915
Timothy A. Salthouse United States	6	247 0.8×	415 2.5×	143 0.9×	105 1.1×	67 1.0×	7	662
Philip T. Smith United Kingdom	14	180 0.6×	212 1.3×	271 1.7×	70 0.7×	32 0.5×	45	680
Otto Waris Finland	13	251 0.8×	250 1.5×	108 0.7×	62 0.7×	30 0.4×	22	516
Daniel P. Blakely United States	4	280 0.9×	166 1.0×	172 1.1×	45 0.5×	31 0.5×	9	537

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Daniel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Daniel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Daniel. The network helps show where Mark Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Daniel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Daniel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Daniel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Daniel. Mark Daniel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Daniel, Mark & Dustin Wahlstrom. (2018). Raw-score equivalence of computer-assisted and paper versions of WISC–V.. Psychological Services. 16(2). 213–220. 10 indexed citations

2.

Hiebert, Elfrieda H. & Mark Daniel. (2018). Comprehension and rate during silent reading: Why do some students do poorly?. Reading and Writing. 32(7). 1795–1818. 12 indexed citations

3.

Daniel, Mark & Dustin Wahlstrom. (2014). Equivalence of Q-interactive™ and Paper Administrations of Cognitive Tasks: WISC ® -V. 15 indexed citations

4.

Daniel, Mark, et al.. (2014). Equivalence of Q-interactive ® and Paper Administrations of Language Tasks: Selected CELF ® -5 Tests. 2 indexed citations

5.

Daniel, Mark. (2010). Reliability of AIMSweb Reading Curriculum-Based Measurement (R-CBM) (Oral Reading Fluency). 5 indexed citations

6.

Daniel, Mark, et al.. (2008). Engineering heap overflow exploits with JavaScript. 1. 32 indexed citations

7.

Daniel, Mark. (1997). Intelligence testing: Status and trends.. American Psychologist. 52(10). 1038–1045. 8 indexed citations

8.

Daniel, Mark. (1997). Intelligence testing: Status and trends.. American Psychologist. 52(10). 1038–1045. 63 indexed citations

9.

Satz, Paul, et al.. (1990). A WAIS-R marker for accelerated aging and dementia, Alzheimer's type?: Base rates of the Fuld formula in the WAIS-R standardization sample. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology. 12(5). 759–765. 7 indexed citations

10.

Detterman, Douglas K. & Mark Daniel. (1989). Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for low IQ groups. Intelligence. 13(4). 349–359. 231 indexed citations

11.

Matarazzo, Joseph D., et al.. (1988). Inter-subtest scatter in the WAIS-R standardization sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 44(6). 940–950. 55 indexed citations

12.

Kramer, Joel H., Dean C. Delis, & Mark Daniel. (1988). Sex differences in verbal learning. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 44(6). 907–915. 173 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact