Annabelle Mark

30 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers

Annabelle Mark
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Health Information Management 45
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 74
  • Public Administration 17
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
Replace Daniel Lozeau with:
Daniel Lozeau Canada
SP Bate United Kingdom
Anthony R. Kovner United States
Rose Gollop United Kingdom
Annemiek Stoopendaal Netherlands
Gil A. Preuss United States
Stephen Willcocks United Kingdom
Lieke Oldenhof Netherlands
Gregory O. Ginn United States
Peter Kragh Jespersen Denmark
Annabelle Mark relative to Daniel Lozeau Canada Daniel Lozeau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel Lozeau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annabelle Mark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annabelle Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabelle Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabelle Mark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annabelle Mark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabelle Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabelle Mark. The network helps show where Annabelle Mark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Annabelle Mark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annabelle Mark Line = papers co-authored together Annabelle Mark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201335
2 200630
3 198929
4 200727
5
Innovations in health care: a reality check
200625
6 200720
7 199915
8 199512
9 19979
10 19898
11 20137
12 20037
13 19917
14 19916
15 19946
16 20045
17 20085
18 19984
19 19953
20 19933

About Annabelle Mark

Annabelle Mark is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Education and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Quality and Management (7 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Dental Education, Practice, Research (3 papers), Organizational Change and Leadership (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (45 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (74 citations), Public Administration (17 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations). Annabelle Mark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Bangladesh and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Liz Fulop, Leslie P. Willcocks, Sue Dopson, Alexandra Harrison, Ann Casebeer, Ross Brennan, Ifan D. H. Shepherd, Richard Elliott, Claire Goodman and Michael Traynor. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Public Money & Management, Leadership, Journal of Information Technology and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact