Stephen Willcocks

491 citations
31 papers · 319 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Willcocks

29 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Stephen Willcocks
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Health Information Management 51
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 117
  • General Health Professions 105
  • Public Administration 14
  • Strategy and Management 59
Replace Daniel Lozeau with:
Daniel Lozeau Canada
Rose Gollop United Kingdom
Linda Cazale Canada
Annabelle Mark United Kingdom
Marjo Suhonen Finland
Gil A. Preuss United States
Charlotta Levay Sweden
Ian Brooks United Kingdom
Kor Grit Netherlands
George Munchus United States
Stephen Willcocks relative to Daniel Lozeau Canada Daniel Lozeau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Daniel Lozeau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Willcocks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Willcocks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Willcocks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Willcocks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Willcocks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Willcocks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Willcocks. The network helps show where Stephen Willcocks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Willcocks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Willcocks Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Willcocks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199463
2 199758
3 199818
4 201517
5 199216
6 199415
7 201114
8 200213
9 199810
10 20169
11 19988
12 20178
13 19958
14 20027
15 20047
16 20007
17 20126
18 20085
19 19994
20 20114

About Stephen Willcocks

Stephen Willcocks is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Quality and Management (13 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Dental Education, Practice, Research (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (4 papers), Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Competency Development and Evaluation (3 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (51 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (117 citations), General Health Professions (105 citations), Public Administration (14 citations) and Strategy and Management (59 citations). Stephen Willcocks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tony Conway, Christopher J. Rees and Paul Milne. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Public Sector Management, BDJ, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Local Government Studies and Journal of Managerial Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact