Gil A. Preuss

11 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Gil A. Preuss
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 130
  • General Health Professions 113
  • Strategy and Management 47
  • Sociology and Political Science 43
  • Public Administration 41
Replace Annemiek Stoopendaal with:
Annemiek Stoopendaal Netherlands
Annabelle Mark United Kingdom
Ian Brooks United Kingdom
Rose Gollop United Kingdom
Elaine Whitby United Kingdom
Annette Cox United Kingdom
Manuela S. Macinati Italy
Charlotte Croft United Kingdom
Christian Gadolin Sweden
Marjo Suhonen Finland
Gil A. Preuss relative to Annemiek Stoopendaal Netherlands Annemiek Stoopendaal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Annemiek Stoopendaal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gil A. Preuss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gil A. Preuss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gil A. Preuss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gil A. Preuss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gil A. Preuss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gil A. Preuss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gil A. Preuss. The network helps show where Gil A. Preuss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gil A. Preuss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gil A. Preuss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gil A. Preuss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gil A. Preuss. Gil A. Preuss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Two Faces of Trust: The Roles of Calculative and Relational Trust in Work Transformation
2
2 15
3 82
4 10
5 23
6
The Effect of Formal Versus Informal Job Security on Employee Involvement Programs
1
7
Models of care: the influence of nurse communication on patient safety.
38
8
The effects of work restructuring on Low-Wage, Low-Skilled workers in U.S. hospitals
11
9 102
10 8
11
Chaparral Steel: Rapid Product and Process Development
2

About Gil A. Preuss

Gil A. Preuss is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Public Administration, having authored 11 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (130 citations), Public Administration (41 citations) and Research and Theory (6 citations). Gil A. Preuss has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mary K. Anthony, Brenda A. Lautsch, Ann C. Frost, Peter Berg, Eileen Appelbaum, Dorothy Leonard‐Barton and Maureen A. Scully. Their work appears in journals such as California Management Review, Industrial and Labor Relations Review and Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026