Rachel Locke
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Education top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Safety Research
- Co-authors
- Samantha ScallanKatie SellersJane PaylerBrian C. CastrucciMelissa GambateseMichael TraynorMichael R. FraserCharlotte Humphrey
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers)Healthcare Quality and Management (5 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Advanced NursingNurse Education Today
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Rachel Locke
39 papers receiving 254 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- General Health Professions 102
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 68
- Education 61
- Clinical Psychology 29
- Safety Research 20
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Locke
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Locke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Locke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Locke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Locke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Locke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Locke. The network helps show where Rachel Locke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Locke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Locke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Locke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Locke. Rachel Locke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | Evaluation of Remediation Support in UK Dentistry | 1 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | Continence Care Pathways | 1 |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | The contribution of nurse, midwife and health visitor entrepreneurs to patient choice: a scoping exercise (NMHV) | 1 |
| 20 | 7 |
About Rachel Locke
Rachel Locke is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health Information Management and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 41 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (5 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (17 citations), Health Information Management (19 citations) and General Health Professions (102 citations). Rachel Locke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Samantha Scallan, Katie Sellers, Jane Payler, Brian C. Castrucci, Melissa Gambatese, Michael Traynor, Michael R. Fraser, Charlotte Humphrey, Susan F. Murray and Annabelle Mark. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Nurse Education Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.