Anna M. Cianci

1.4k citations
32 papers · 891 indexed · h-index 17

Anna M. Cianci

31 papers receiving 850 citations

Peers

Anna M. Cianci
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Accounting 395
  • General Decision Sciences 34
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 178
  • Information Systems and Management 116
  • Finance 163
Replace Emily E. Griffith with:
Emily E. Griffith United States
Michael G. Williamson United States
Carolyn Strand Norman United States
Dustin J. Sleesman United States
Larry N. Killough United States
Michael D. Akers United States
Derek W. Dalton United States
Urton Anderson United States
Paul V. Martorana United States
Breda Sweeney Ireland
Anna M. Cianci relative to Emily E. Griffith United States Emily E. Griffith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Emily E. Griffith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Cianci

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Cianci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Cianci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Cianci more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Cianci

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Cianci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Cianci. The network helps show where Anna M. Cianci may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna M. Cianci, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna M. Cianci Line = papers co-authored together Anna M. Cianci links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20212
3 202012
4 201841
5 201826
6 201822
7 20172
8 201466
9 201456
10 20129
11 201149
12 20111
13 2010161
14 201053
15 201036
16 200913
17 200959
18 200820
19 200723
20
Contributions of the ?Research Opportunities in Auditing? Program: An Empirical Assessment
19984

About Anna M. Cianci

Anna M. Cianci is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Accounting and Information Systems and Management, having authored 32 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (19 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (395 citations), General Decision Sciences (34 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (178 citations). Anna M. Cianci has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Howard J. Klein, Gerard Seijts, George T. Tsakumis, Steven E. Kaplan, James L. Bierstaker, Lihua Huang, Hsihui Chang, Sean T. Hannah, John Schaubroeck and Gary A. McGill. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Business Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026