Amy E. Smith

918 total citations
36 papers, 564 citations indexed

About

Amy E. Smith is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy E. Smith has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 564 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Gender Studies, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Amy E. Smith's work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (11 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (6 papers). Amy E. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Gender Diversity and Inequality (11 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (6 papers). Amy E. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Amy E. Smith's co-authors include Deneen M. Hatmaker, Ignacio J. Martinez‐Moyano, Martin R. Bryce, Brian Tarbit, Andrei S. Batsanov, Leisha DeHart‐Davis, Sanjay K. Pandey, David P. McCaffrey, Meghna Sabharwal and Kwang Bin Bae and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Amy E. Smith

34 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amy E. Smith United States	15	177	149	93	84	83	36	564
Norihiko Takeuchi Japan	17	57 0.3×	112 0.8×	58 0.6×	14 0.2×	405 4.9×	39	802
Jeffrey C. Kennedy New Zealand	12	70 0.4×	133 0.9×	51 0.5×	10 0.1×	269 3.2×	32	628
Paul Smith United Kingdom	15	82 0.5×	241 1.6×	25 0.3×	434 5.2×	76 0.9×	59	818
Bruce W. Wilkinson United States	10	26 0.1×	176 1.2×	54 0.6×	40 0.5×	38 0.5×	32	769
Amna Yousaf Pakistan	13	128 0.7×	123 0.8×	34 0.4×	7 0.1×	332 4.0×	40	684
Eng Fong Pang Singapore	12	14 0.1×	262 1.8×	50 0.5×	20 0.2×	28 0.3×	84	567
Keith Randle United Kingdom	12	89 0.5×	175 1.2×	212 2.3×	61 0.7×	88 1.1×	22	645
Peter Miller Australia	11	29 0.2×	88 0.6×	67 0.7×	6 0.1×	172 2.1×	41	568
Tanachia Ashikali Netherlands	7	196 1.1×	157 1.1×	31 0.3×	81 1.0×	247 3.0×	15	494
Eve Spangler United States	8	84 0.5×	176 1.2×	43 0.5×	52 0.6×	179 2.2×	19	531

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Smith. The network helps show where Amy E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy E. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy E. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy E. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy E. Smith. Amy E. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Smith, Amy E., et al.. (2025). Where power and scholarship collide: Gender and coauthorship in public administration research. Public Administration Review. 85(6). 1853–1869.

Pandey, Sanjay K., et al.. (2022). Reimagining race and gender in public administration and public policy: Insights from an interdisciplinary systematic review. Public Administration Review. 83(1). 14–34. 18 indexed citations

Portillo, Shannon, Amy E. Smith, & Alesha E. Doan. (2022). Up the Chain: Gendered Mentoring in the U.S. Army. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 43(2). 359–380. 2 indexed citations

Wang, Luda, et al.. (2021). Engineering and characterization of gymnosperm sapwood toward enabling the design of water filtration devices. Nature Communications. 12(1). 1871–1871. 17 indexed citations

DeHart‐Davis, Leisha, et al.. (2020). Gender Imbalance in Public Sector Leadership. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 23 indexed citations

Smith, Amy E., et al.. (2015). Black African Nurses Educated in the United States. Journal of Nursing Education. 54(2). 72–79. 10 indexed citations

Smith, Amy E. & Deneen M. Hatmaker. (2014). Knowing, Doing, and Becoming: Professional Identity Construction among Public Affairs Doctoral Students. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 20(4). 545–564. 25 indexed citations

Smith, Amy E.. (2014). Getting to the Helm: Women in Leadership in Federal Regulation. Public Organization Review. 14(4). 477–496. 9 indexed citations

Smith, Amy E., et al.. (2014). Amputee Athletes, Part 1: Foundational Knowledge. International Journal of Athletic Therapy & Training. 19(2). 33–38. 2 indexed citations

10.

Tucker, Anita R., Amy E. Smith, & Michael A. Gass. (2014). How Presenting Problems and Individual Characteristics Impact Successful Treatment Outcomes in Residential and Wilderness Treatment Programs. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth. 31(2). 135–153. 13 indexed citations

11.

Smith, Amy E.. (2013). Information Symmetry in U.S. Financial Market Regulation: A Community of Practice. International Public Management Journal. 16(4). 504–531. 2 indexed citations

12.

Smith, Amy E. & Ignacio J. Martinez‐Moyano. (2012). Techniques in Teaching Statistics: Linking Research Production and Research Use. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 18(1). 107–136. 20 indexed citations

13.

Smith, Amy E., et al.. (2011). Some Ceilings Have More Cracks. The American Review of Public Administration. 43(1). 50–71. 64 indexed citations

14.

Smith, Amy E. & Craig Haney. (2010). Getting to the point: Attempting to improve juror comprehension of capital penalty phase instructions.. Law and Human Behavior. 35(5). 339–350. 12 indexed citations

15.

Smith, Amy E.. (2009). Locating Privacy in Tudor London. 22. 282.

16.

Goldfarb, Brent, Gerald Marschke, & Amy E. Smith. (2009). Scholarship and inventive activity in the university: complements or substitutes?. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 18(8). 743–756. 18 indexed citations

17.

Smith, Amy E., et al.. (2008). (Dimethoxy‐ and Dihalopyridyl)boronic Acids and Highly Functionalized Heteroarylpyridines by Suzuki Cross‐Coupling Reactions. European Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2008(8). 1458–1463. 24 indexed citations

18.

Smith, Amy E., et al.. (2007). New Pyrimidylboronic Acids and Functionalized Heteroarylpyrimidines by Suzuki Cross‐Coupling Reactions. European Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2007(34). 5712–5716. 18 indexed citations

19.

McCaffrey, David P., Amy E. Smith, & Ignacio J. Martinez‐Moyano. (2006). "Then Let's Have a Dialogue": Interdependence and Negotiation in a Cohesive Regulatory System. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 17(2). 307–334. 29 indexed citations

20.

Oakes, William, et al.. (2003). Service-learning in engineering. 2. F3A–1. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact