Paul Smith

51 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers

Paul Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Public Administration 434
  • General Health Professions 275
  • Political Science and International Relations 250
  • Gender Studies 82
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 74
Replace Diane van den Broek with:
Diane van den Broek Australia
Daniel B. Cornfield United States
Shannon Portillo United States
Gail Hebson United Kingdom
Rae Cooper Australia
Brandi Blessett United States
Ralph Fevre United Kingdom
Geraldine Healy United Kingdom
Sharon Wright United Kingdom
Sophie Yates Australia
Paul Smith relative to Diane van den Broek Australia Diane van den Broek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Diane van den Broek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Smith. The network helps show where Paul Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Smith Line = papers co-authored together Paul Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The New Workplace and Trade Unionism
1995187
2 199376
3 200572
4 200158
5 200654
6 201347
7 199031
8 200924
9 199419
10 200619
11 199818
12 196818
13 201516
14 201616
15 199116
16 198314
17
Ethnic groups in international relations
199112
18 20178
19 20078
20 20018

About Paul Smith

Paul Smith is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and General Health Professions, having authored 59 papers that have together received 821 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (21 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (8 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (6 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (3 papers) and Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (434 citations), General Health Professions (275 citations), Political Science and International Relations (250 citations), Gender Studies (82 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (74 citations). Paul Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Chris Smith, Peter Ackers, Tom Evens, Petros Iosifidis, John R. Cutcliffe, Sue Jackson, Chris Stevenson, Huw Morris, Roger Undy and Charles K. Mann. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Industrial Relations, Work Employment and Society, Applied Organometallic Chemistry, Media Culture & Society and Industrial Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact