Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: the importance of attitude to online learning
2020208 citationsJustine Ferrer, Allison Ringer et al.Higher Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Allison Ringer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Ringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Ringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Ringer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Ringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Ringer. The network helps show where Allison Ringer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Allison Ringer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Allison Ringer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Allison Ringer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Allison Ringer. Allison Ringer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ferrer, Justine, et al.. (2020). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: the importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education. 83(2). 317–338.208 indexed citations breakdown →
Zutshi, Ambika, et al.. (2013). Subject coordinator role and responsibility: experiences of Australian academics. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 46(1). 56–80.1 indexed citations
6.
Ringer, Allison, et al.. (2013). Response rates in Australian market research. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).
Ringer, Allison, et al.. (2011). Student perception of learning approach and teamwork benefits in accounting: A qualitative study. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 1–20.1 indexed citations
10.
Ringer, Allison, et al.. (2010). Cultural diversity in the modern tertiary environment : the role of assessment and learning approaches. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–10.1 indexed citations
Ringer, Allison, et al.. (2007). Trends in consumer segmentation. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).2 indexed citations
13.
Ringer, Allison & Michael Jay Polonsky. (2006). International marketing journals : a preliminary regional and institutional examination of research productivity. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 1–9.1 indexed citations
14.
Ringer, Allison, et al.. (2005). Cause-Related Marketing: An Extension Of The Congruity Concept. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 198–206.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.