Alexander Georg Büssing

559 total citations
15 papers, 280 citations indexed

About

Alexander Georg Büssing is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Alexander Georg Büssing has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 280 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Alexander Georg Büssing's work include Environmental Education and Sustainability (8 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). Alexander Georg Büssing is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Education and Sustainability (8 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). Alexander Georg Büssing collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sweden. Alexander Georg Büssing's co-authors include Susanne Menzel, Florian Fiebelkorn, Mandy Singer‐Brodowski, Marco Rieckmann, Matthias Barth, Daniel Fischer, Kerstin Kremer, Alina Weber, Jacqueline Dupont and Johannes Halbe and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Sustainability and Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

In The Last Decade

Alexander Georg Büssing

14 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Alexander Georg Büssing Germany	10	99	95	84	71	28	15	280
Nicola Walshe United Kingdom	13	199 2.0×	273 2.9×	67 0.8×	149 2.1×	53 1.9×	37	516
Meghan C. McLean United States	5	71 0.7×	34 0.4×	46 0.5×	163 2.3×	5 0.2×	8	327
Shu‐Chiu Liu Taiwan	11	139 1.4×	174 1.8×	59 0.7×	67 0.9×	8 0.3×	19	331
Eddie Boyes United Kingdom	9	178 1.8×	177 1.9×	38 0.5×	134 1.9×	4 0.1×	13	344
Alistair Raymond Bryce Soutter United Kingdom	5	115 1.2×	14 0.1×	38 0.5×	148 2.1×	18 0.6×	6	293
G. Montagu Benton United States	8	175 1.8×	85 0.9×	150 1.8×	88 1.2×	6 0.2×	11	354
Michele C. Everett United States	12	30 0.3×	105 1.1×	54 0.6×	110 1.5×	15 0.5×	18	339
Charles E. Roth United States	8	354 3.6×	176 1.9×	76 0.9×	158 2.2×	4 0.1×	16	457
Lili-Ann Wolff Finland	9	150 1.5×	194 2.0×	52 0.6×	51 0.7×	3 0.1×	24	315
Daniela Sellmann-Risse Germany	7	186 1.9×	86 0.9×	164 2.0×	76 1.1×		12	306

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Georg Büssing

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Georg Büssing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Georg Büssing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Georg Büssing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Georg Büssing

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Georg Büssing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Georg Büssing. The network helps show where Alexander Georg Büssing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander Georg Büssing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander Georg Büssing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander Georg Büssing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander Georg Büssing. Alexander Georg Büssing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Büssing, Alexander Georg, et al.. (2026). Pre-service teachers and climate change education: a belief-intention gap yet to be bridged. Environmental Education Research. 1–25.

Büssing, Alexander Georg, et al.. (2025). Emotions, connectedness to nature and sustainable behaviour: investigating the effects of students’ engagement in extracurricular activities with living animals. Journal of Biological Education. 60(1). 84–101. 1 indexed citations

Kremer, Kerstin, et al.. (2024). Students' credibility criteria for evaluating scientific information: The case of climate change on social media. Science Education. 108(3). 762–791. 6 indexed citations

Kremer, Kerstin, et al.. (2024). Students' awareness and conceptions of science‐related communication mechanisms on social media. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 62(3). 756–791. 4 indexed citations

Singer‐Brodowski, Mandy, et al.. (2023). Emotions and transformative learning for sustainability: a systematic review. Sustainability Science. 19(1). 307–324. 27 indexed citations

Fischer, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Teacher Education for Sustainable Development: A Review of an Emerging Research Field. Journal of Teacher Education. 73(5). 509–524. 64 indexed citations

Kremer, Kerstin, et al.. (2021). Psychological distance towards COVID-19: Geographical and hypothetical distance predict attitudes and mediate knowledge. Current Psychology. 42(10). 8632–8643. 15 indexed citations

Weber, Alina, et al.. (2020). Do German Student Biology Teachers Intend to Eat Sustainably? Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior with Nature Relatedness and Environmental Concern. Sustainability. 12(12). 4909–4909. 23 indexed citations

Fiebelkorn, Florian, et al.. (2020). Virtual Reality Nature Experiences Involving Wolves on YouTube: Presence, Emotions, and Attitudes in Immersive and Nonimmersive Settings. Sustainability. 12(9). 3823–3823. 50 indexed citations

10.

Büssing, Alexander Georg, Jacqueline Dupont, & Susanne Menzel. (2020). Topic Specificity and Antecedents for Preservice Biology Teachers’ Anticipated Enjoyment for Teaching About Socioscientific Issues: Investigating Universal Values and Psychological Distance. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 1536–1536. 11 indexed citations

11.

Büssing, Alexander Georg, et al.. (2019). Can a Like Save the Planet? Comparing Antecedents of and Correlations Between Environmental Liking on Social Media, Money Donation, and Volunteering. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 1989–1989. 13 indexed citations

12.

Büssing, Alexander Georg, et al.. (2019). An adapted concept mapping technique to help conservation implementation – Exemplified for wolves returning to Lower Saxony in Germany. Global Ecology and Conservation. 20. e00784–e00784. 6 indexed citations

13.

Büssing, Alexander Georg, et al.. (2019). Values and beliefs as predictors of pre‐service teachers’ enjoyment of teaching in inclusive settings. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 19(S1). 8–23. 17 indexed citations

14.

Büssing, Alexander Georg, et al.. (2018). Emotions and pre-service teachers’ motivation to teach the context of returning wolves. Environmental Education Research. 25(8). 1174–1189. 17 indexed citations

15.

Büssing, Alexander Georg, et al.. (2018). Do Pre-service Teachers Dance with Wolves? Subject-Specific Teacher Professional Development in A Recent Biodiversity Conservation Issue. Sustainability. 11(1). 47–47. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact