Geeske Scholz
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 10%
- Co-authors
- Claudia Pahl‐WostlArt DewulfÉmile ChappinGary PolhillMatteo GaglioloJohannes HalbeBruce EdmondsHarko Verhagen
- Topics
- Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers)Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (5 papers)Energy and Environment Impacts (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Modeling and SimulationGlobal and Planetary ChangeManagement Science and Operations Research
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFrontiers in PsychologySustainability
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Geeske Scholz
18 papers receiving 378 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Global and Planetary Change 133
- Sociology and Political Science 93
- Management Science and Operations Research 72
- Modeling and Simulation 45
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 42
Countries citing papers authored by Geeske Scholz
This map shows the geographic impact of Geeske Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geeske Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geeske Scholz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geeske Scholz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geeske Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geeske Scholz. The network helps show where Geeske Scholz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geeske Scholz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geeske Scholz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geeske Scholz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geeske Scholz. Geeske Scholz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 92 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | An agent-based model of consensus building | 2 |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | 3 |
About Geeske Scholz
Geeske Scholz is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Global and Planetary Change and Pollution, having authored 19 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (5 papers) and Energy and Environment Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (45 citations), Global and Planetary Change (133 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (72 citations). Geeske Scholz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claudia Pahl‐Wostl, Art Dewulf, Émile Chappin, Gary Polhill, Matteo Gagliolo, Johannes Halbe, Bruce Edmonds, Harko Verhagen, Francesca Giardini and Nigel Gilbert. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.