Young Exceptional Children

362 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 362 papers published in Young Exceptional Children in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Young Exceptional Children usually cover Education (161 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (139 papers) and Clinical Psychology (134 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Disability Support Research (103 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (75 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Young Exceptional Children are Michaelene M. Ostrosky, Phillip S. Strain, Gail E. Joseph, Lee Ann Jung, Jennifer Grisham-Brown, Mary Louise Hemmeter, Philippa H. Campbell, Eva Horn, Gregory A. Cheatham and Virginia Buysse.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Young Exceptional Children

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Young Exceptional Children. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Young Exceptional Children.

Countries where authors publish in Young Exceptional Children

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Young Exceptional Children. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Young Exceptional Children with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Young Exceptional Children more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025