Teaching Public Administration

372 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 372 papers published in Teaching Public Administration in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Teaching Public Administration usually cover Education (115 papers), Public Administration (113 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (79 papers) specifically the topics of Public Policy and Administration Research (108 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (49 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Teaching Public Administration are Phil Turner, Paul Cairney, John Fenwick, Richard A. Chapman, Andrew Gunn, Mike Rowe, Michael Thom, Bruce D. McDonald, Leonard Bright and Ian Elliott.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Teaching Public Administration

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Teaching Public Administration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Teaching Public Administration.

Countries where authors publish in Teaching Public Administration

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Teaching Public Administration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Teaching Public Administration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teaching Public Administration more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025