Journal of Orthodontic Science

358 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 358 papers published in Journal of Orthodontic Science in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Orthodontic Science usually cover Orthodontics (273 papers), Oral Surgery (142 papers) and Molecular Biology (97 papers) specifically the topics of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (239 papers), dental development and anomalies (94 papers) and Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Orthodontic Science are Mona Aly Abbassy, Pradeep Tandon, Tarek El‐Bialy, Amal I. Linjawi, Tripti Tikku, Kamna Srivastava, Rohit Khanna, Sridevi Padmanabhan, Rayyan A. Kayal and Amit Nagar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Orthodontic Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Orthodontic Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Orthodontic Science.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Orthodontic Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Orthodontic Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Orthodontic Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Orthodontic Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025