Replace The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education with:
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf EducationUnited States
Language Speech and Hearing Services in SchoolsUnited States
Learning Disability QuarterlyUnited States
American annals of the deafUnited States
Journal of Communication DisordersUnited States
Learning Disabilities Research and PracticeUnited States
Clinical Linguistics & PhoneticsUnited States
InfancyUnited States
The Journal of Special EducationUnited States
International Journal of Speech-Language PathologyAustralia
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf EducationUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Topics in Language Disorders
Topics in Language Disorders · 1×
×1.724.3kDEP
×1.711.5kCN
×0.52.8kEDUCA
×0.83.4kCP
×3.26.5kLL
Citations per year, relative to Topics in Language Disorders
Topics in Language Disorders · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Topics in Language Disorders
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Topics in Language Disorders. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Topics in Language Disorders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Topics in Language Disorders more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Topics in Language Disorders
This network shows the impact of papers published in Topics in Language Disorders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Topics in Language Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.