David Scott

17 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

David Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Anthropology 83
  • Cultural Studies 66
  • Literature and Literary Theory 49
  • Sociology and Political Science 195
  • Political Science and International Relations 88
Replace Steven Salaita with:
Steven Salaita Egypt
Adolfo Gilly Mexico
Tina M. Campt United States
E. San Juan United States
Satya P. Mohanty United States
Bart Moore‐Gilbert United Kingdom
Lata Mani United States
Wendy S. Hesford United States
Ama Mazama United States
Elizabeth J. Clifford United States
David Scott relative to Steven Salaita Egypt Steven Salaita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Steven Salaita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Scott. The network helps show where David Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside David Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Scott Line = papers co-authored together David Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999278
2 200760
3 201428
4 20178
5 20158
6 19917
7
Researching Education: Data, Methods and Theory in Educational Enquiry (2nd Edition)
20115
8 20145
9 20185
10
How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2016
20164
11 20223
12 19992
13 20162
14 20142
15 20212
16 20212
17 20231
18 19981
19 20001
20 19961

About David Scott

David Scott is a scholar working on Education, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Philosophy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Educational Policies and Reforms (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper), Comparative and International Law Studies (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper) and Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (83 citations), Cultural Studies (66 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (49 citations), Sociology and Political Science (195 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (88 citations). David Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include M. G. Cooper, Robin Usher, Sandra Leaton Gray, Peeter Mehisto, Christopher S. Martin, Lucinda G. Miller, Ignacio Rodríguez, Wahyudin P. Syam, E. Martı́nez and Charles D. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Journal of Education Policy, European Journal of International Law, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Journal of the History of Ideas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact