Reading & Writing Quarterly

832 papers and 12.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 832 papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 12.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (589 papers), Education (557 papers) and Statistics and Probability (125 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (470 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (188 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (125 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reading & Writing Quarterly are Frank Pajares, Dale H. Schunk, Paul R. Pintrich, Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink, Mary J. Schleppegrell, Barry J. Zimmerman, Gordon D. Logan, Barbara J. Guzzetti, Marcia H. Davis and John T. Guthrie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Reading & Writing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reading & Writing Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reading & Writing Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025