Corrosion Reviews

741 papers and 10.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 741 papers published in Corrosion Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Corrosion Reviews usually cover Materials Chemistry (493 papers), Metals and Alloys (229 papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (215 papers) specifically the topics of Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (397 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (229 papers) and Concrete Corrosion and Durability (208 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Corrosion Reviews are S.P. Lynch, Lekan Taofeek Popoola, Andrej Atrens, Ahmed A. Farag, Chongchong Tang, Martin Steinbrueck, Hans J. Seifert, Michael Stueber, Bruce G. Pound and Daniel John Blackwood.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Corrosion Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Corrosion Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Corrosion Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Corrosion Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Corrosion Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Corrosion Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corrosion Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025