Countries where authors publish in Archaeological Prospection
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archaeological Prospection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archaeological Prospection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archaeological Prospection more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Archaeological Prospection
This network shows the impact of papers published in Archaeological Prospection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archaeological Prospection.
About Archaeological Prospection
The 794 papers published in Archaeological Prospection in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Archaeological Prospection usually cover Space and Planetary Science (262 papers), Geophysics (370 papers), Ocean Engineering (419 papers), Geology (123 papers) and Paleontology (116 papers) specifically the topics of Geophysical Methods and Applications (409 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (302 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (262 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (190 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (123 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (116 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (81 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archaeological Prospection are Geert Verhoeven, Ralf Hesse, Stefano Campana, Neil Linford, Kenneth L. Kvamme, Keith Challis, Wolfgang Neubauer, Gregory N. Tsokas, Lawrence B. Conyers and Rinita A. Dalan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.