Archaeological Prospection

765 papers and 10.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 765 papers published in Archaeological Prospection in the last decades have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Archaeological Prospection usually cover Ocean Engineering (409 papers), Geophysics (364 papers) and Space and Planetary Science (247 papers) specifically the topics of Geophysical Methods and Applications (398 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (295 papers) and Archaeological Remote Sensing using Remote Sensing Techniques (247 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archaeological Prospection are Geert Verhoeven, Ralf Hesse, Stefano Campana, Kenneth L. Kvamme, Neil Linford, Keith Challis, Gregory N. Tsokas, Wolfgang Neubauer, Rinita A. Dalan and Lawrence B. Conyers.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archaeological Prospection

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archaeological Prospection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archaeological Prospection.

Countries where authors publish in Archaeological Prospection

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archaeological Prospection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archaeological Prospection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archaeological Prospection more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025