Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

3.0k papers and 831.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology in the last decades have received a total of 831.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (2.2k papers), Cell Biology (764 papers) and Oncology (246 papers) specifically the topics of RNA Research and Splicing (334 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (287 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (281 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology are V. Narry Kim, Joan Massagué, Kai Simons, Claudio Hetz, Richard J. Youle, Guido Kroemer, D. Grahame Hardie, Harald Stenmark, Ling‐Ling Chen and Martin D. Bootman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025