Reviews of Modern Physics

995.5k citations
3.0k papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
    • Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
    • Quantum and electron transport phenomena
    • Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
    • Topological Materials and Phenomena
    • Advanced Chemical Physics Studies

Papers in

    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 267
    • Nuclear physics research studies 248
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 247
    • Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates 195
    • Atomic and Molecular Physics 195
    • Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics 189
    • Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 171

Reviews of Modern Physics

2.8k papers receiving 943.9k citations

Peers

Reviews of Modern Physics
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Condensed Matter Physics 192.7k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 505.6k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 148.7k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 112.0k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 108.9k
Replace Physics Reports with:
Physics Reports United States
Nature Physics United States
Reports on Progress in Physics United States
Nature Photonics United States
Nature Materials United States
Nature Nanotechnology United States
Physical Review X United States
Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk Russia
Physics-Uspekhi Russia
Annual Review of Physical Chemistry United States
Reviews of Modern Physics relative to Physics Reports United States Physics Reports's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Physics Reports · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Reviews of Modern Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews of Modern Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews of Modern Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics.

About Reviews of Modern Physics

The 3.0k papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics in the last decades have received a total of 995.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (718 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k papers), Condensed Matter Physics (456 papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (325 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (364 papers) specifically the topics of Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (267 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (257 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (248 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (247 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (195 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (195 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (189 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (171 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews of Modern Physics are P. G. de Gennes, M. Zahid Hasan, C. L. Kane, Albert-Ĺaszló Barabási, Réka Albert, Clemens Roothaan, P. C. Hohenberg, Shou-Cheng Zhang, Xiao-Liang Qi and Martin Moskovits.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026