Reviews of Modern Physics

3.0k papers and 1.0M indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics in the last decades have received a total of 1.0M indexed citations. Papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (720 papers) and Condensed Matter Physics (458 papers) specifically the topics of Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (270 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (260 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (247 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews of Modern Physics are P. G. de Gennes, C. L. Kane, M. Zahid Hasan, Albert‐László Barabási, Clemens Roothaan, Réka Albert, P. C. Hohenberg, Xiao-Liang Qi, Shou-Cheng Zhang and Steven Weinberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Reviews of Modern Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews of Modern Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews of Modern Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews of Modern Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025