Cancer and Metastasis Reviews

1.8k papers and 131.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 131.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews usually cover Molecular Biology (911 papers), Oncology (804 papers) and Cancer Research (535 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Cells and Metastasis (215 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (187 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (141 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews are Rakesh K. Jain, Arnulf Mayer, Peter Vaupel, James P. Quigley, Elena I. Deryugina, John A. Hickman, Garth L. Nicolson, Frances R. Balkwill, Gerhard Christofori and M. Deniz Yilmaz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cancer and Metastasis Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025