Trends in Biochemical Sciences

604.7k citations
6.3k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • RNA Research and Splicing
    • RNA modifications and cancer
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics
    • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
    • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Cell Biology top 0.5%

Papers in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 914
    • RNA Research and Splicing 502
    • RNA modifications and cancer 482
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 380
    • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 331
    • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 305
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 278

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

5.8k papers receiving 577.5k citations

Peers

Trends in Biochemical Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Molecular Biology 414.8k
  • Cell Biology 72.8k
  • Aging 5.5k
  • Cancer Research 38.1k
  • Biochemistry 16.8k
Replace Annual Review of Biochemistry with:
Annual Review of Biochemistry United States
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences United States
Gene United States
Journal of Cellular Physiology United States
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology United States
Nature Protocols United States
Advances in experimental medicine and biology United States
Current Opinion in Cell Biology United States
Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology United States
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects United States
Trends in Biochemical Sciences relative to Annual Review of Biochemistry United States Annual Review of Biochemistry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Annual Review of Biochemistry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Biochemical Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences.

About Trends in Biochemical Sciences

The 6.3k papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 604.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences usually cover Molecular Biology (4.6k papers), Cell Biology (868 papers), Biochemistry (233 papers), Structural Biology (36 papers) and Clinical Biochemistry (142 papers) specifically the topics of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (914 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (502 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (482 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (380 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (331 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (316 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (305 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (278 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Biochemical Sciences are R. John Ellis, Péter Tompa, Roger A. Sayle, Jason W. Locasale, Thomas von Zglinicki, Andrei N. Lupas, Philip Cohen, L. Aravind, Maria V. Liberti and Kay Hofmann.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact