Désirée Lie

2.7k citations
82 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Désirée Lie

79 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Désirée Lie
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Family Practice 137
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 293
  • General Health Professions 869
  • Emergency Medical Services 231
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 798
Replace Cynthia Whitehead with:
Cynthia Whitehead Canada
Abbas Tavakoli United States
Matthew J Ridd United Kingdom
Constance D. Baldwin United States
Jeffrey Borkan United States
Beverley O’Brien Canada
Maya M. Hammoud United States
Mark Goldszmidt Canada
Thomas R. Freeman Canada
Janice Chesters Australia
Désirée Lie relative to Cynthia Whitehead Canada Cynthia Whitehead's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Cynthia Whitehead · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Désirée Lie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Désirée Lie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Désirée Lie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Désirée Lie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Désirée Lie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Désirée Lie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Désirée Lie. The network helps show where Désirée Lie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Désirée Lie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Désirée Lie Line = papers co-authored together Désirée Lie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20183
2 201531
3 20159
4 201415
5 201264
6 2010261
7 20109
8 200920
9 200938
10 200812
11 200837
12 200720
13 200731
14 200663
15 200675
16 200658
17 200419
18 20022
19 200134
20 199832

About Désirée Lie

Désirée Lie is a scholar working on Family Practice, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medical Services and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (34 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (19 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (15 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (14 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (12 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (10 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (8 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (137 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (293 citations), General Health Professions (869 citations), Emergency Medical Services (231 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (798 citations). Désirée Lie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Russia. Frequent co-authors include John Boker, Johanna Shapiro, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Clarence H. Braddock, Elizabeth T. Lee-Rey, Kevin Lohenry, Christopher P. Forest, Felicia Cohn, Michael D. Prislin and Pradip Patel. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, Medical Education Online, Academic Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Medical Teacher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026