Medical Science Educator

1.6k papers and 7.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Medical Science Educator in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Science Educator usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k papers), Education (402 papers) and General Health Professions (391 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (1.1k papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (254 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (196 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Science Educator are Megan E. L. Brown, Kurt O. Gilliland, Olle ten Cate, Kenneth D. Royal, Claudia Díaz, James D. Pickering, Geoffrey A. Talmon, Nicole J. Borges, Michael Hortsch and Gary L. Beck Dallaghan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medical Science Educator

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Science Educator. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Science Educator.

Countries where authors publish in Medical Science Educator

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Science Educator. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Science Educator with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Science Educator more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025