Countries where authors publish in Accounting Forum
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accounting Forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accounting Forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accounting Forum more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Accounting Forum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accounting Forum.
About Accounting Forum
The 621 papers published in Accounting Forum in the last decades have received a total of 21.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Accounting Forum usually cover Accounting (283 papers), Strategy and Management (243 papers), Management Information Systems (137 papers), Public Administration (40 papers) and Marketing (72 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (196 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (133 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (126 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (100 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (69 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (52 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (50 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accounting Forum are Prem Sikka, Vivien Beattie, Mervyn K. Lewis, Michael John Jones, Geoff Lamberton, Lee D. Parker, Jan Bebbington, David J. Campbell, James Guthrie and Stella Fearnley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.