Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

836 papers and 48.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 836 papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory in the last decades have received a total of 48.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory usually cover Accounting (739 papers), Strategy and Management (210 papers) and Management Information Systems (144 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (728 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (331 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (156 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory are Jere R. Francis, K. Raghunandan, Lawrence Abbott, Gary F. Peters, Susan W. Parker, W. Robert Knechel, Joseph V. Carcello, Dasaratha V. Rama, Gopal V. Krishnan and Marshall A. Geiger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025